Posted on 07/23/2011 2:37:49 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
TV 2 know that the 32-year-old terror accused Oslo man has confessed to having published the material on the web. There are sources in the police confirming this to the TV 2
Anders Behring Breivik (32) Prior to the attacks, published a long manifesto and a video on the Internet, where he describes the attacks he was about to perform.
The video and document
"Marxist Hunter"
It is about more than twelve minutes long video, which Behring Brevik compare themselves with Knights, and encourage a year-long war against Marxism and Islamism.
He has also published a manuscript of 1,500 pages which he explains very extreme political views. In addition, he describes in detail how an attack to be carried out. Everything from the use of the car bomb of the type of equipment to be used in an attack.
On an image that has not previously been known pose the seemingly Anders Behring Breivik in a diving suit with what looks like an automatic rifle. On his shoulder he has a badge that says "Marxist Hunter."
In the document, which is over 1500 pages the author elaborates on events throughout history and will repeatedly return to the Knights Templar, or Knights Templar as they say in English.
Today, the Knights Templar, an order within the Masonic movement, which also Anders Behring Breivik was a member of. He will now be excluded from the Masonic Order.
(Excerpt) Read more at translate.google.com ...
yes
He wasn’t a fascist.
There is no allowance, by law, for political viewpoints that diverge significantly from that of what we call “Political Correctness” or Marxism...and that is enforced By Law.
The terrorist assault he conducted may very well have been the only possible outlet for this man.
You are guessing.
He is more concerned about protecting Western Civilization, and recognizes the two greatest threats against Western Civilization to be Islamic infiltration and Marxism under various guises.
He went after an anti-Western Civilization indoctrination camp.
Your remark suggests irrationality on his part. His irrationality is not in the target of his attack.
Actually, he identified multiculturalism as an aspect of Marxism.
2 main enemies, and not his enemies, but enemies of Western Civilization.
That is exactly what jihadis think. And this - he did nothing in any way to act like a martyr. If he wanted to be a martyr why didn't he shoot at the cops? He allowed himself to be arrested without incident, apparently. This does not compute whatsoever.
One other thing of importance which the MSM will probably get around to mentioning after they read the manifesto, is that Breivik talked about taking anabolic steroids A LOT.
Might be one of the key explanations for the violence.
I’m sorry, but he has expressed a viewpoint and willingness to commit violence in favor of Western Civilization.
This one man they will kill.
Only an insane butcher could do what he did. Even (I noted on another thread) the German soldiers shooting Jews in Kiev had to get drunk to be able to do it, as described in the book Babi Yar.
Yes it does.
The cops were not automatically marxists bent upon destroying Western Civilization.
The kids in that camp, and the camp leaders themselves...*were*.
You’re guessing.
You have a video and a manifesto. He kept no secrets. He tells you exactly why he did what he did.
There was nothing insane about it.
If you have a few Biblical passages to protect your own sanity, then keep them handy, but you don’t have to guess that he is an insane butcher.
Here is where you are wrong.
If he hated Islam because of its evil butchery and jihad and Sharia and all the rest, why did he act exactly like them and butcher unarmed young people? Why did he say what I quoted about about screwing around being okay because he was going to martyr himself? Exactly like a regular Muslim jihadi. Except he didn’t martyr himself.
In the name of “threats against Western Civilization” he acts exactly like the enemy of Western Civilization. That’s irrational to the max.
he reminds me of the Unabomber.
Absolutely.
“Sure. They fit in a phone booth. None in power or close to being in power.”
Three of the more well known European national government leaders who are free market conservatives and who defeated their socialist opponents in recent elections are: (1)Angela Merkel of the Christian Democratic Union in Germany who defeated her Social Democrat opponent, Gerhard Schroeder and won reelection; (2)Nicholas Sarkozy of the Union for a Popular Movement in France who defeated the Socialist Party candidate, Segoline Royal; and (3) David Cameron of the Conservative Party who defeated Gordon Brown of the Labour Party.
Italy’s Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi is also a free market economic conservative who defeated the socialists in Italy. Berlusconi may be Italy’s most successful capitalist, ever.
Additionally, the Prime Minister of Denmark, Lars Rasmussen is a member of the Liberal Party (which is a center-right party in Denmark). He also defeated the Social Democrat.”Liberal” in this instance means economic liberalism or free markets as opposed to a planned (socialist) economy.
Sweden also has a non-socialist Prime Minister, John Reinfeldt of the Moderate Party which is the mainstream conservative Party in Sweden. The Social-Democrats ruled Sweden for the better party of 70 years but they are now in the minority.
One more time, from what I previously posted
“The EPP is the LARGEST party represented in each of the institutions of the European Union, and also the LARGEST in the Council of Europe. It has 73 member parties from 39 countries, with 17 EU and 6 non-EU HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT, 13 European Commissioners (including the President), the President of the European Council, and the largest group in the European Parliament with 264 members.”
Maybe the guy who wrote the manifesto is not the same guy who posted around the internet...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.