Skip to comments.
‘Pregnancy is not a disease’: Bishops slam Planned Parenthood push for free birth control
LifeSiteNews ^
| 7/20/11
| Kathleen Gilbert
Posted on 07/20/2011 4:11:04 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Pregnancy is not a disease, and fertility is not a pathological condition to be suppressed by any means technically possible, said Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Tuesday. Perfectly stated!
1
posted on
07/20/2011 4:11:10 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2
posted on
07/20/2011 4:11:58 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: NYer
Ping
3
posted on
07/20/2011 4:12:34 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
4
posted on
07/20/2011 4:13:07 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
I think PP is worried that the States who are blocking their Medicaid funding will be successful. If they can get birth control covered under Medicaid, then they will be able to clamour that they need the Medicaid funding for handing out some condoms and morning after pills. Of course, they would comingle that money like usual, and use it to subsidize abortions.
5
posted on
07/20/2011 4:45:16 PM PDT
by
Boogieman
To: All
6
posted on
07/20/2011 4:49:24 PM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: wagglebee
Pregnancy is not a disease. Pregnancy is a stage of life which creates new life. 0bama’s attitude that people are punished with a baby is all to prevalent.
To: wagglebee
Pregnancy is not a disease. Pregnancy is a stage of life which creates new life. 0bama’s attitude that people are punished with a baby is all too prevalent.
To: wagglebee
Sorry, but I’d much rather pay for BCPs than abortions or welfare babies.
Pregnancy IS a pathological condition, if society at large has to pay for the results long-term.
9
posted on
07/20/2011 5:08:19 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: clee1; wagglebee
Id much rather pay for BCPs than abortions or welfare babiesThis is a false dichotomy (or whatever the word is for erroneously limiting options to three, instead of two). It is not either/or (as I'm sure you know, since you wouldn't be a FReeper if you were a dimwit). The general public need not pay for contraceptives, abortions, OR the rearing of children, unless they allow their elected representatives to force them to do so.
Here's my plan: private pay or private charity for everything to do with people's personal lives: housing, medical care, education, food, clothing, utilities, gas, blah blah blah.
10
posted on
07/20/2011 6:23:44 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Public schools = TSA: incompetent, abusive, anti-American. Why are we putting up with either one?)
To: wagglebee
11
posted on
07/21/2011 9:00:59 AM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: clee1
Both of your choices kill a baby.
12
posted on
07/21/2011 9:02:25 AM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: clee1; Dr. Brian Kopp; trisham; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; Lesforlife; ...
Sorry, but Id much rather pay for BCPs than abortions or welfare babies. Why pay for any of it?
Pregnancy IS a pathological condition, if society at large has to pay for the results long-term.
Perhaps you could be more specific.
How exactly do you consider pregnancy to be a "pathological condition"? Do you think it's a disease?
Do you support some form of eugenics program that keeps certain people from having babies?
13
posted on
07/21/2011 9:40:40 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Tax-chick
Here's my plan: private pay or private charity for everything to do with people's personal lives: housing, medical care, education, food, clothing, utilities, gas, blah blah blah. ABSOLUTELY!!! It's the only sane, rational and honorable way. And with the hugely reduced taxes, people could afford to give more to charities of their choice.
14
posted on
07/21/2011 9:47:39 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
15
posted on
07/21/2011 9:53:47 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: clee1
BCPs are abortifacients. So, by paying for them, you ARE paying for abortions.
16
posted on
07/21/2011 10:03:35 AM PDT
by
surroundedbyblue
(Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
To: clee1
It’s the responsibility of the parents to raise the child, not have welfare support it.
Cut welfare now. Hunger is a great motivator to work.
17
posted on
07/21/2011 10:19:55 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Be the kind of woman that when you wake in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
To: metmom
Hunger is a great motivator to work. I keep telling my son that, but he just rolls his eyes ;-).
18
posted on
07/21/2011 1:08:54 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Public schools = TSA: incompetent, abusive, anti-American. Why are we putting up with either one?)
To: wagglebee; clee1
Do you support some form of eugenics program that keeps certain people from having babies? >>>
Unfortunately, many republicans think that way. It’s usually the so-call fiscally conservatives/social liberals who love killing “black babies who will be a product of the welfare system and eventually go on welfare themselves when they get older” as they say. These republicans fail to understand that most of these killed babies would have grown up and worked and spent their own money on consumables, contributed to the economy and would have contributed to the social security system.
19
posted on
07/21/2011 2:27:27 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Adult Stem Cells Work, there is NO Need to Harvest Babies for Their Body Parts!)
To: Coleus
These republicans fail to understand that most of these killed babies would have grown up and worked and spent their own money on consumables, contributed to the economy and would have contributed to the social security system. Exactly!
MURDERING 53 MILLION BABIES destroyed our economy.
20
posted on
07/21/2011 4:11:34 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson