Posted on 07/19/2011 5:53:36 PM PDT by silentknight
The 234-190 vote sends the "cut, cap and balance" plan to the Democratic-controlled Senate, where it has virtually no chance of passing.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
I meant you’re wasting your breath explaining to Palin KADs BDS’ers why Bachmann voted no.
Now would be the opportunity for the Democrats who still consider themselves Americans to make a statement.
Approve the house bill and make Obama veto it. They might just do that so Obama can veto it and show his base that he is the man.
Don’t discount it. Obama will lose more credibility when he says “I said if this crosses my desk I would veto it. The bill never crossed my desk.”
And leave it to YOU to bring up Palin in a thread about Bachmann. You’re pathetic.
Oh ok I see.
There won't EVER be a BILL, now, that says it's doing away with ObabamCare and so this is a cop-out for her. Wake up; she talks out of both sides of her mouth and/or wants to have things both ways, while helping the DEMS!
As I’ve already stated she had her own legislation (with Steve King and Louie Gohmert) which would prioritize our spending and NOT raise the debt ceiling. This vote is basically buying into the MSM meme that we have to raise the debt ceiling or the world will come to an end. Let’s not forget that Ryan, Boehner, Cantor all voted for TARP.
You’re correct and Bachmann knows this, or if she doesn’t, she isn’t as “bright” as others claim she is.
That's naive, plain and simple.
See my reply to your earlier post.
I’m all over that too R_D.
The senate plan is “gaining momentum” while the house wastes time passing a bill with “no chance in the senate”.
Just wow on the poor reporting from media.
But Palin was not one of the 'no' votes.
I, for one of many here, who are Palin supporters, would eviscerate her, if she pulled this crap.
No where in her official statement on Promises does she ONCE mention repealing Obamacare. Why would she insist on adding that caveat to CC&B?
For the record: YOU:
“She said that she would vote yes on this, last week, or thereabouts. She’s pulling a Ron Paul ( has done it before ), which means that she’s voting WITH the DEMS, as he so often does! Will she vote for the damned GANG OF SIX crapola, instead?”
ME: “Please quote where she said she would vote yes.”
YOU: “Yes, she did say that and please don’t ask me for a link, because I really don’t remember where I saw it, but I do remember reading it.”
CONCLUSION: You tried to lie in this thread about Michelle Bachmann. When others decided to call you on it, you are unable to quote where she said she would vote yes.
Again, please quote where she said she would vote yes. We are all waiting for you to substantiate your claim.
Or takes her dolls and goes home when she doesn’t get what she wants. Way to put the American people first, Michele.
And you're the one who has a problem, not I.
It’s amazing.
It exists, where she said she would vote yes, but you are not able to find it, and you can’t remember it, even though someone just posted it a few posts up.
Really amazing how its that close but you are unable to quote it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.