Posted on 07/19/2011 9:45:02 AM PDT by Redalways
Doesn't matter...YOU DON'T PUT OFF REPORTING A MISSING 2 YEAR OLD. That's pretty much all the evidence you need excepting opportunity. No nanny, no grandma, grandpa...only momma had opportunity.
Her not reporting it eliminates everyone else like a boyfriend, mailman, milkman, electrician...whomever.
Like I said about the jurors: 11 airheads and a plant!!
See post #25. You're one accidental visit to that porn site likely resulted in dozens of hits.
I completely agree with you on that one. And it doesn’t take a genius to figure it out.
No reason at all for her to look it up...she already knows what the stuff is all about.
To you it's just a maniac in the park wildly waving his arms in the air. To the "maniac" he just waked into a spider web that you can't see.
LOL! Here. My software sucks so let me rewrite it in the middle of the trial so it will get the right answer. Yay!
So a competing product gets it right and Mr Cacheback's stuff sucks wind.
The bigger question is why did OPD run both products? Perhaps it's well-known the law enforcement community that Mr Bradley's software is(was?) overly ambitious?
What trial were they talking about because the Defense DID present evidence that it was only one search. The Jury DID get the info I do believe.
Well, meet one. Me. When you open the door of a dish washer during the drying cycle, if have put in detergent that contains chlorine you could be exposed to chloroform. Same thing with the clothes dryer with some softeners that you include.
I think that is the result of the problem described here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.