Posted on 07/14/2011 6:49:51 PM PDT by SandRat
Eight illegal immigrants from Mexico were arrested on drug trafficking charges after federal and Las Vegas law enforcement officials seized 212 pounds of drugs worth an estimated street value of $5.7 million in the largest methamphetamine bust in Nevada history,
(Excerpt) Read more at azstarnet.com ...
So how many terrorists have we executed to date?
Bummer, man. Now a sh*tload of roofers, strippers, painters and "escorts" are all gonna' oversleep!sarc
Did they ever fire and jail the Vegas cops that riddled full of bullets and killed the 208 pound veteran at Cosco last summer ???
I don’t know....
>>> Think Jesse killed the new cook?
Didn’t happen. If you notice as the scene ended, Jesse is pointing the pistol at Gail, then shifts the pistol several degrees to point directly at the camera. Only then does he fire. Fade out.
In other words that had to be a warning shot.
In this country or around the world? ... Are you trying to be a smartass, Sherman?
It could have been a legitimate question or a rhetorical one. You seem quick to conclusion jump either way.
More wonderful, U.S. government approved immigrants...
(liberalturdian logic on)If we’d just legalize meth this would never happen, now we have to pay to keep them in our already overcrowded jails! Legalize meth Now!(liberalturdian logic off)
:::rolls eyes:::
Don’t try to compete with Walt and Gus and Jesse. The Mexican stuff isn’t nearly as good as the blue stuff.
These people are in this country. As such they are subject to our criminal laws, not the laws of war, regardless of how appropriate it might be to switch them into the other category.
So you think they should be treated just as other terrorists caught in this country have been treated, and executed? My question is how many of them have we executed according to law. Unless I’m quite mistaken, the answer is none.
In fact, I don’t believe we have legally executed any terrorists overseas, either. We’ve killed a good many of them, but to my knowledge none have been executed by process of law.
Here’s your answer ... notice if you will the ‘legally’ the smarmy poster included. His ilk would put Osama bin Laden in prison, rather than cap the sonofabitch. I have no use for such posters
Friends of Harry?
Thanks for responding directly to me. High class posting etiquette.
Since you (didn’t) ask, I have no problem with killing Osama, or with killing any terrorists engaged in war on us.
Are you seriously in favor of killing drug dealers captured in America on the spot and without trial, as has been done with terrorists overseas? I must admit such a policy would escalate the War on Drugs quite dramatically, although a large number of freepers seem to be opposed to prosecution of this War even at its present low level.
I have heard the death of Obama referred to as “killing,” but the term execution has seldom been used, as whether you like it or not it implies that the killing was carried out as the result of a legal or quasi-legal process. Enemies killed in battle are not “executed.”
Haah, you assume you deserve ‘high class etiquette’! Toddle along now. Perhaps, someday, you will come to realize these vermin invading from the south and running drugs to fund their stay and further criminal activity her are in fact terrorist engaged in war on the people of this nation. Check your skirt, your lieberal slip is showing, dude.
Ping!
You seriously want random cops deciding on the spot whether to execute captured drug dealers?
Really?
Doesn’t that present some minor constitutional problems?
Have you read any of the recent articles on FR about out of control cops? You want these same jerks given power to summarily execute prisoners as they see fit?
You think objecting to this is a liberal notion?
Wow.
That is a big gack bust
The equivalent of a multi ton coca bust in the 90s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.