DONATE
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing $10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your buck!
Please Sign up Now!
Posted on 07/14/2011 8:39:11 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
On 9/11/01,when terrorists killed almost 3,000 innocent Americans during an attack on our economic system, Americans were outraged. We went halfway around the world to exact vengeance, and spent the next 9-plus years hunting down the leader responsible.
Tough words were thrown around by politicians looking to be out front with their patriotism and desire to protect Americans, as only they know how.
These same politicians have ignored a much more dangerous enemy, one that has killed many more Americans than the Muslims ever did, and whose leaders are blatant and up front about their desire to destroy America.
These leaders are even printing instructions for their terrorist accomplices, showing them how to break into America, and how to cause as much damage to the American economy as possible.
When are we going to get an honest politician, a true leader, one who will tell the truth of the danger we face on a daily basis from these invaders?
They have the same philosophy as the Muslims. As their terrorist leader has stated publicly, wherever they are, it is their country. It matters not whose borders they have breached. As long as they are there, no one else has any rights.
When the 9/11 commission released its report, they stated that the Muslims had been at war with us for years, we just didn’t recognize it.
Well, what’s the difference between the war the Muslims waged, and the war the Mexicans have been waging for 60 years and more? Both are killers, but we only hold one responsible…
We toppled the Taliban in Afghanistan, not because they attacked us, but ….harbored al Queda. How is that different from a corrupt punk president of a backwater, primitive nation, sending his killers to America
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
It isn’t just washington it most of our political leaders. Bush and McCain are open border type of guys and so is Rick Perry to name a few.
I know, but he claimed the New World in the name of Spain, not in the name of Italy (which didn't even exist yet as a single nation).
My point is Spain began the "exploitation" of the "indigenous pipples" and yet Spanish is treated as if it were a native Third World language while Columbus is blamed on the USA.
Gotchya. Its like slavery was a uniquely US intitution which never existed anywhere in the world before the US won its independence..
Excellent point. And what are the requirements for being Hispanic? That you come from a place once colonized from Spain? That makes all native Floridians Hispanic. It's foolish - there is no such thing as being Hispanic.
No war needed; build the WALL, put the military on the border and let Mexico go to Hell.
Exactly!
What "anti-slavery" crusader today is mad at Brazil?
High expectations from a government hell bent on accomplishing just the opposite.
The Arab or Middle Eastern slave trade continued into the early 20th century. Slavery in Morocco was outlawed in the 1930s. As recently as the 1950s, Saudi Arabia had an estimated 450,000 slaves, 20% of the population.
And we know how much the left is enamored by the so-called Arab Spring.
“But what if we win? ;-)”
Why we spend hundreds of billions we don’t have rebuilding their turd world country.
“Declaring war on Mexico while still having 30 MILLION “fifth column” partisans within our borders might not be too bright.”
That’s not a problem, we could just round them up and put them in “camps”. :-D
**Darn tootin’ we need more shootin’.**
Not my fantasy. Just speculating on why fed.gov was running guns to Mexico.
OK.. got it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.