Posted on 07/14/2011 8:39:11 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
On 9/11/01,when terrorists killed almost 3,000 innocent Americans during an attack on our economic system, Americans were outraged. We went halfway around the world to exact vengeance, and spent the next 9-plus years hunting down the leader responsible.
Tough words were thrown around by politicians looking to be out front with their patriotism and desire to protect Americans, as only they know how.
These same politicians have ignored a much more dangerous enemy, one that has killed many more Americans than the Muslims ever did, and whose leaders are blatant and up front about their desire to destroy America.
These leaders are even printing instructions for their terrorist accomplices, showing them how to break into America, and how to cause as much damage to the American economy as possible.
When are we going to get an honest politician, a true leader, one who will tell the truth of the danger we face on a daily basis from these invaders?
They have the same philosophy as the Muslims. As their terrorist leader has stated publicly, wherever they are, it is their country. It matters not whose borders they have breached. As long as they are there, no one else has any rights.
When the 9/11 commission released its report, they stated that the Muslims had been at war with us for years, we just didn’t recognize it.
Well, what’s the difference between the war the Muslims waged, and the war the Mexicans have been waging for 60 years and more? Both are killers, but we only hold one responsible…
We toppled the Taliban in Afghanistan, not because they attacked us, but ….harbored al Queda. How is that different from a corrupt punk president of a backwater, primitive nation, sending his killers to America
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Declare war against Mexico and, assuming we do win (though we haven’t had a decisive win in awhile), what do we do with it, occupy it?
But what if we win? ;-)
Let me get this straight: Between you and Peale, going to war with Mexico is apparently the only alternative to ending the BS between Mexico and the US? Yeah.....riiiiight, we are teetering on the default abyss, already spending oodles of money in Afghanistan and Iraq, involved in more money expenditures in Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. Yeah, keep up the good work and rational thinking fellas..... =.=
While we're at it we take over all the oil wells.
The petroleum industry in Mexico makes it the sixth largest producer of oil in the world
That’s a big “if.” I’m not sure we would. Remember, tens of millions of Mexico’s countrymen live here and can create a lot of mischief on its behalf.
We can use the Lybia gambit and call it A “kinetic military action”, ISO a war.
Nice fantasy, but not gonna happen.
I’d settle for throwing whatever we can at protecting and sealing the border. We have one of the most powerful and expansive militaries in history, yet we stand by and do little to nothing on our very own border while we are being invaded by millions upon millions of illegals.
Unfortunately, like Israel, America feels guilty for existing. Our leaders feel that our country is a foreign implant on a land that had been populated by Spanish-speaking Roman Catholics from all eternity.
I wish the politicians, academicians, and others of the "chattering classes" who thought we were a foreign European mote in an otherwise utopian paradise of "indigenous" Spaniards (!!!) would just assuage their guilt by going "back" to Europe and let the rest of us run things here. But that's about as realistic as expecting eugenics advocates to kill themselves.
PS: Ever notice that on Columbus Day no lefties ever burn the Spanish flag? Interesting, ain't it???
Mr. Reale is apparently unaware of just *who* our CinC is - and specifically his dismal record on war prosecution....
Good point. Let’s cut and run now. People have no apetite for any more war... until the next building blows at least. The giant fell asleep again. ;-)
Darn tootin’ we need more shootin’.
Columbus was an Italian. He but worked for the Spanish.
There is this option as well, and it’s very interesting in that it requires only one governor to implement it; though for appearance reasons it would be best of it was one of the southern border-states:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2698298/posts (Written NM specific, but the general idea is likely portable to most States in the union, which would involve that state’s constitution instead.)
Take Baja, Sonora, Chihuahua. Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas for sure.
Perhaps Sinaloa, Durango, Zacatecas, and San Luis Potosi could be part of a buffer zone.
Quintana Roo, Yucatan and Campeche should be a separate country.
either declare war or stfu and mind our own business!
Thats not true. Every war that America has entered into in the last 20 years has been about oil,
so,
Mexico has oil.
The war will be about oil.
Oil and Bush’s fault.
At what point can Obama take some responsibility?
Declaring war on Mexico while still having 30 MILLION “fifth column” partisans within our borders might not be too bright.
Deport ALL illegals and their anchor babies FIRST.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.