![](http://www.technologyreview.com/files/66298/flywheel-220.jpg)
Flying by:A computer model of Volvo's flywheel, with an outer section cut away. Credit: Volvo
To: sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; sausageseller; ...
Automobile Tech Ping!.............
2 posted on
07/13/2011 12:46:26 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(PEAS in our time? Obama cries PEAS! PEAS! when there is no PEAS!..........................)
To: Red Badger
3 posted on
07/13/2011 12:55:04 PM PDT by
Cboldt
To: Red Badger
And will the torque make it easy to turn right but hard to turn left?
4 posted on
07/13/2011 12:56:01 PM PDT by
SeeSharp
To: Red Badger
7 posted on
07/13/2011 1:00:55 PM PDT by
SnuffaBolshevik
("The trouble with internet quotations is you don't know if they are true"-Abraham Lincoln.)
To: Red Badger
To reduce friction, they've sealed the flywheels inside a vacuum chamber. Seems like for production automobiles, there would be a bigger problem with soft Chinese bearings than with drag from the *air*.
8 posted on
07/13/2011 1:03:25 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: Red Badger
Flywheels are great...as long as you don't want to turn and if you can overcome the gyroscopic action, it's great.
I recall talk of this back in the 90s for Tanks. One of the issues was that when the tank is moving, It can't turn or it could potentially flip over. That's a lot of energy.
![](http://thewellrats.com/malbor2/fr/tankrailgun.jpg)
9 posted on
07/13/2011 1:04:37 PM PDT by
Malsua
To: Red Badger
I wonder if a “normally sealed unit” - as “sealed” as most ordinary “sealed” units are in cars today, filled with some very slippery but dense liquid (to reduce the flywheel’s friction) and with the flywheel suspended in it (suspended in the liquid), would be better (”almost” as efficient and more economical) than a pure vacuum.
For heat (the sealed-in-fluid may obtain heat in the operation of the flywheel), engineer the casing of the unit to “exchange” the heat out of the unit in some way, either simply, because it - the casing is exposed to air somehow, or some more esoteric solution.
13 posted on
07/13/2011 1:23:34 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: Red Badger
Those things will act like C4 in an accident.
15 posted on
07/13/2011 1:30:53 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
To: Red Badger
utomakers face the problem of how to maintain the vacuum, since the seals that connect the flywheel to a transmission aren't perfect. Simple, make the flywheel essentially the inner part of an electric generator. Add or bleed energy using electromagnets, not a mechanical transmission.
To: Red Badger
To: Red Badger
And how will the extra energy needed to spin the flywheel and carry its weight be offset by transferring its reduced spin to power the wheels? Sounds like perpetual motion to me.
To: Red Badger
If you lose the vacuum just hand this back-up to your wife or girlfriend and say you need her to reduce some friction...
![](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/217vnCInn4L._SL500_AA300_.jpg)
31 posted on
07/13/2011 2:16:11 PM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Red Badger
The torque issues are real, no matter how the flywheel is oriented.
But equal counter-rotating wheels will address the issue fully, given a sturdy frame to connect them.
35 posted on
07/13/2011 3:46:24 PM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson