Posted on 07/13/2011 11:17:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
He’s part of the lying liberal media, so most assuredly that whatever he is saying is the complete opposite of reality.
This election has yet to really begin so it is silly to count anyone out yet.
He’s being SARCASTIC. His point is that Palin is a VERY viable Republican candidate if she gets in, not the opposite. He’s saying that anybody who bets against our Sarah is a FOOL.
Sheesh.
May not be fair, but it is a fact.
I would put my money on she’s not going to run;
The Fox News people, Bill OReilly and others dont think so.
Why? Because he and the others get her on their shows since she is a Fox New Contributor under contract. They know what she is available to talk about, what she can and cannot talk about, what issues she has little depth or greater depth about commenting. I would guess she has some pretty big holes in that reportroire, one of which was mentioned as foreign policy.
Frankly speaking if Perry gets in we dont need a Palin.
Perry has a few policy negatives, but is a true blue conservative even though Palin has no policy negatives.
“You can forget about Sarah Palin as a Republican candidate, if you want to look silly by fall”
People, RTFA.
Please read the whole column: It’s not what you think. It’s as pro-Palin as you’re likely to see in a major paper.
Is he right?
No
And, unlike Zero, she won’t need a billion dollars to win the election.
BINGO!!
I believe I'll wait and see. Only one thing is certain - any writer for the LA Times reporting on Sarah Palin is bound to have his or her head up his or her digestive tract.
It IS early. The field will chew each other up and a lot can and WILL happen this summer.
Palin is still young and she could wait to take a Secretary appointment if a conservative Pubbie gets in. Forget Romney or Perry... they would only sabotage her future. (Unfortunately the Bildabergers tapped Perry.)
I am a big Palin fan but I may throw my support behind Ron Paul this time.
Ron Paul would chew Obama or ANY Dimocrat up in a debate. He also had a LOT of Dim support in 2008. He is a shoe in for the presidency but TPTB in the Republican Party would sabotage him in favor of Obama if he gets the nomination. (Just like they’ve already done to Palin) The Tea Party and other conservatives will need to really really get behind Ron Paul if he or Bauchman or Palin get the nomination.
Paul will have to thread the needle to get past FOXNEWS and not offend Republican NONleadership. FOX has screwed Paul every chance they’ve had. They go out of their way to sabotage him.
Back on subject.... Palin would be a HUGE asset in a Paul presidency.
There is the Newsweek article and now this seeming to speculate it will be a go. What gives?
Kinda scared, aren’t you LAT?
Perhaps you know that Sarah could totally eviscerate your idiot president in a sentence or two.
Obama is a speechless d*ck without his prompter.
And besides, he can’t hunt.
This dude is seriously whistling past the graveyard.
nah, sounds pretty LEFT to me!
You can Freepmail me the Kewpie doll ;)
... or at least taking her a lot more seriously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.