Replies

Okay, dipsnot, read all of that quote of me again, read it s-l-o-w-l-y, read all of it in context, and try again. I know, context is so subtle and elusive, not to mention convenient to ignore when scrambling, searching for staw men.

But as you somehow cogently pointed out in your first post to me on this ridiculous, tragically over-beaten long-dead horse of a non-issue (!!!), there is nothing ot be gained by fabrications. So stop it. Please. You're probably better than this.

"You and your PDS thugs... stop in daily..."

read it again, slowly, in context:

"You and your PDS thugs... stop in daily..."

Not just poor widdle Stevie Johnny Bakie thingy. All the PDS thugs were being explicitly referred to in that statement.

So now who is having to lead the "ignoramus" around to show him what he missed? Now who is making stupid crap up to prove a pointless, piccayune, petulant and petty point?

And just what does this "Daddy replacing" predator have on you guys that you'll spend days rushing to his defense (from nothing!) like he was some kind of blind schoolgirl under attack by husky Latvians?

Get a life.

8^D

Okay, dipsnot,... ah more reasoned collegial rhetoric. Nice.

...read all of that quote of me again, read it s-l-o-w-l-y, read all of it in context, and try again. I know, context is so subtle and elusive, not to mention convenient to ignore when scrambling, searching for staw men.

You just stop in daily to urinate repeatedly on Palin threads...

Did you say this or didn't you? Did you agree with this primise or didn't you? LINK You chose to copy this isolated statement and repost it in another post, and there's no denying whatsover what your intent was.

In the original you made a reference to something else a collective didn't do (facetiously), then transitioned into something one person did. I can't help it if you're inarticulate.

But as you somehow cogently pointed out in your first post to me on this ridiculous, tragically over-beaten long-dead horse of a non-issue (!!!), If it's as you describe it here, a non-issue, why are you in denial peddling as fast as you can? there is nothing ot be gained by fabrications. So stop it. Please. Let me know when I say something that isn't true. You're probably better than this. If you want me to take you serious, it might help if you don't reference me to be a dipsnot, having daddy issues, or being an Ignoramjus.

"You and your PDS thugs... stop in daily..." LINK That's what you're claiming, but it's not what you posted in the original. You used the word "you" as you changed the subject. If you wanted to continue the collective as you changed the subject, you should have stated something like 'you folks' or 'you all' or 'at least one of you'... You could have also used an "and" in there, to make it a compound sentence.

read it again, slowly, in context:

Not just poor widdle Stevie Johnny Bakie thingy. You're condescention doesn't impact SJB. It impacts you when folks watch you act childish like this. All the PDS thugs were being explicitly referred to in that statement. Nope. Nice try, but you moved from addressing behaviors those people did not do, to addressing a different subject that SBJ supposedly did do.

So now who is having to lead the "ignoramus" around to show him what he missed? Ignoramus? These are very powerful arguments you're using here. /s Now who is making stupid crap up to prove a pointless, piccayune, petulant and petty point? You still are. Dancing around like an elephant in a tutu isn't going to help you out of this mess you created for yourself either.

And just what does this "Daddy replacing" predator have on you guys that you'll spend days rushing to his defense... Daddy replacing? Oh, so now you're a licensed phychologist? What degrees do you have in this field?

...(from nothing!) Like making stuff up about him? That's nothing?

...like he was some kind of blind schoolgirl under attack by husky Latvians? Are you a husky Latvian? Who knew?

Get a life. I've got one.

8^D

Just a few of your posts that reflect your premise that you were talking about a group...

Post 84 You just stop in daily to urinate repeatedly on Palin threads... Correct! I don't see any clarifcation there, claiming you were talking about a group. Do you?

Post 92 Here you take him (alone) to task again on the frequecy of his posts to Palin threads. We later found out was that two out of three examples provided by someone else didn't even address Palin.

Post 137 There were fewer than 24 Palin threads yesterday alone, and he posted on 2-or-3 of them... Hmmm, doesn't look like a comment about a group to me. 2 of 3 did not reference Palin.