The article says explicitly that "Nearly every point in the pledge conflicts with the values of most American Jews, who largely disagree with most of the points made by the pledge and oppose racist and homophobic rhetoric." NJDC says the same thing twice, and very explicitly.
(1) "Nearly every point in the pledge conflicts with the values of most American Jews," and
(2) "who largely disagree with most of the points made by the pledge "
This makes it clear beyond any doubt that NJDC is not citing a few portions of the Family Leader pledge to which it takes exception. It denounces "most of the points" and "nearly every point" and then lists those below as specific examples.
Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.LBJ’s 1965 War on Poverty was triggered in part by the famous ‘Moynihan Report’ finding that the black out-of-wedlock rate had hit 26%; today, the white rate exceeds that, the overall rate is 41% and over 70% of African-American babies are born to single parents - a prime sociological indicator for poverty, pathology and prison regardless of race or ethnicity.
So NJDC would have us believe that Jews are in favor of babies being born to and raised by single parents, and thus ending up in poverty and prison regardless of race or ethnicity. Since most are Black, however, maybe NJDC really prefers Black people to remain on the Democratic Party's kinder and gentler slave plantation and therefore dependent on government programs. Simon Legree lives, and he's a National Judenrat Democratic Kapo! Note also that NJDC denounces the pledge as "racist" even though it says very clearly that single parenting is bad for children of any race or ethnicity, thus underscoring this organization's long history of dishonesty.
Recognition of the overwhelming statistical evidence that married people enjoy better health, better sex, longer lives, greater financial stability, and that children raised by a mother and a father together experience better learning, less addiction, less legal trouble, and less extramarital pregnancy.NJDC finds the above statement objectionable and contrary to the values of American Jews--a statement that, as an American Jew, I therefore regard NJDC's statement as anti-Semitic. Come to think of it, NJDC's article could, with only a few minor revisions, stand in for the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Humane protection of women and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy - our next generation of American children - from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.Again, the NJDC lists this as a point that CONFLICTS with the values of most American Jews, and stresses that Jews "disagree with most of the points made by the pledge." NJDC is therefore saying that Jews support human trafficking--there are plenty of anti-Semitic hate groups that say the same thing--along with infanticide and sexual slavery. I regard this as anti-Semitic hate speech directed at me personally, and NJDC has been my openly declared enemy ever since it used its purportedly Jewish identity to whitewash MoveOn.org's hate speech against Jews, Catholics, and others.
Support for the enactment of safeguards for all married and unmarried U.S. Military and National Guard personnel, especially our combat troops, from inappropriate same-gender or opposite-gender sexual harassment, adultery or intrusively intimate commingling among attracted (restrooms, showers, barracks, tents, etc.); plus prompt termination of military policymakers who would expose American wives and daughters to rape or sexual harassment, torture, enslavement or sexual leveraging by the enemy in forward combat roles.NJDC just went on record as supporting sexual harassment, rape, torture, and enslavement of female American military personnel. Remember, the material in the quotes is the pledge Bachmann signed, and NJDC cited these particular points as CONFLICTING with the values of American Jews.
Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control.NJDC's synagogue is the first synagogue I have ever seen with minarets, and a muezzin instead of a cantor. NJDC supports Sharia and embraces anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control.
Fierce defense of the First Amendment’s rights of Religious Liberty and Freedom of Speech, especially against the intolerance of any who would undermine law-abiding American citizens and institutions of faith and conscience for their adherence to, and defense of, faithful heterosexual monogamy.
NJDC just went on record as supporting legally enforceable speech codes and must therefore be regarded as a de facto albeit not de jure domestic enemy of the United States.
I think NJDC just dug itself into a hole it cannot possibly get out of. This needs to be circulated as widely as possible to make it clear that the NJDC just published on its own Web site an anti-Semitic tirade worthy of Mel Gibson, the difference being that NJDC was stone cold sober when it did this.
NJDC = National Judenrat Democratic Kapos, which is admittedly unfair to kapos (Jews who collaborated with Nazis) because the kapos almost universally acted under duress and would have been killed had they not cooperated. NJDC is under no duress whatsoever when it posts anti-Semitic material and anti-Christian images (Bubbie versus the GOP, with Jesus and ministers portrayed in a "This is the Enemy" context plus the Cross in the blue field of the U.S. Flag--an obvious knockoff of anti-Semitic propaganda with the Star of David in the same context. http://www.stentorian.com/MoveOn/njdc.html for screen shots)
We are dealing basically with the political counterpart of a common prostitute with no shame, honor, or common decency whatsoever.
If liberal jews are pissed at Bachman....she must be doing something right.
The NJDC can’t handle the truth.
Any real Jews belong to this group?
Pledges, pledges, pledges...
Oh, they've made a poll of practicing Jews? Or are they just talking to the "liberal first, religious Jewish last" ones?
The key here is Jewish and DEMOCRAT with the emphasis on DEMOCRAT.
In simple fact, EVERYTHING the pledge condemns is in fact condemned explicitly in or by implication in the Torah.
The problem with many DEMOCRATs, of ALL religious persuasions is their “Holy Text” is not the Torah or Bible, but the flawed book of secular humanism which has created the moral decay and degeneracy which is destroying our culture.
The God of the Bible brought the first European colonists to America, a land of milk and honey. And the God of the Bible did the same to the ancient Hebrews. And that same Bible warned the Hebrews that the land would “vomit them out” if they failed to follow his precepts in morality and theology.
The same thing will happen to us here if we continue to do they did.
Finally, a conservative with some guts!
You knew when you posted this that this group is NOT a mainstream Jewish Group. It’s a front group for Israel haters and this administration. Shame, shame on you.
Oooh Bachmann’s got the loony Left mad at her. I love it. :D
Typical response from a bunch of libtard commies:
Mission:
NJDC maximizes Jewish support for Democrats at the federal and state levels of government.
NJDC also educates Democratic elected officials and candidates to increase support for Jewish domestic and foreign policy priorities.
We do this to promote both social justice in America and a secure, democratic Jewish State of Israel.
>>Nearly every point in the pledge conflicts with the values of most American Jews
...at least, the ones who worship Obama and Marx.
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/32764
In other words, it's a pure letterhead organization with no actual substance.
And good for Michelle Bachmann being honest and up front aout her value system. It is high time more of us did that!
Offensive! Political correctness is in itself offensive to most Americans. Don’t let them label us for what we believe to be true! They have no leverage so they use labeling and have no place to jump but onto the “put down” wagon! God bless Ms Bachmann.
Not that I needed another reason to like her, but thanks.
Egads. More signing of pledges. Oooh, it’s just like middle school and signing a stupid pledge so you could be like the kewl kids. Grow up already. Signing those things are nothing but begging to offend someone and get yourself into hot water. She should have told them no on the first pledge like Herman Cain did. This does not bode well for her decision making.
Those things are, in fact, offensive to the 75% of Jews who vote for the commies reflexively.
NJDC ?
More like SoS :
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Rev. 2:9
&
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
Rev. 3:9
sometimes I really wonder why He wastes His time ?