[sergeantdave]

There are so many flaws in your “logic,” that’s it’s tough to know where to begin.

I won’t go thru your post point by point, because there’s an easier way to destroy your post.

Let’s start with DQA. The Data Quality Act, passed by Congress and signed by George Bush, DEMANDS that any bureaucrat agency bases its rules on SCIENCE.

What DQA means is that ANY rule ginned up by eco-fascist bureaucrats MUST pass the DQA test that it is, indeed, the BEST science available.

But it goes beyond that. Any American, poor, dumb, interested, can challenge any bureaucratic rule in court. And the bureaucracy must present its best scientific facts to support its position.

If they fail, the rule is squashed. In addition, the courts MUST use only the best science when finding for or against a decision. If they don’t, they can be impeached and thrown in prison.

Semper fi, FRiend

[Gondring]

And I am asking you, what part of the rule doesn't meet the DQA? The EPA has provided all of their technical basis and it seems to be the best science available. I haven't found any flaws (though I haven't looked at much of it, nor am I qualified to evaluate many sections), so I've asked for input on what is supposedly not the best science.

They held public hearings that allowed "Any American, poor, dumb, interested," to attend (you can even download the recordings), and they've provided updates right into this week. For example, there's a TSD from July 1, 2011.

In fact, the public comment period for the proposed mercury and air toxic standards has been extended until August 4.