[Gondring]

And I am asking you, what part of the rule doesn't meet the DQA? The EPA has provided all of their technical basis and it seems to be the best science available. I haven't found any flaws (though I haven't looked at much of it, nor am I qualified to evaluate many sections), so I've asked for input on what is supposedly not the best science.

They held public hearings that allowed "Any American, poor, dumb, interested," to attend (you can even download the recordings), and they've provided updates right into this week. For example, there's a TSD from July 1, 2011.

In fact, the public comment period for the proposed mercury and air toxic standards has been extended until August 4.

[sergeantdave]

Do you pride yourself in getting off topic like a liberal?

We were talking about the migratory molecule rule, not DQA.

If you care to investigate, the migratory molecule rule was shot down by the USSC.

As I asked, explain the Migratory molecule rule. Then you ask me what part of the rule doesn’t meet the DQA?

You can’t even state what the migratory molecule rule is. You think Muskie wrote legislation to enable the migratory molecule rule. Cite it.