Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic
I will be the first or second to say this is a great idea!
2 posted on
07/06/2011 3:57:02 PM PDT by
jonsie
To: tioga; truthkeeper; rbmillerjr; wolfcreek; caww; Protect the Bill of Rights; dfc1; ...
To: afraidfortherepublic
That's what I don't get....Everyone says Casey was a good mother....over and ovr and over....
But what "good mother" fails to report their child missing???? How stupid can people be.
And she should have been charged with negligence!!!!
To: afraidfortherepublic
Certainly a needed law. Also, it would be good to permanently ban jurors such as these from ever serving on a jury again. They obviously aren’t competent enough to serve.
To: afraidfortherepublic
To: afraidfortherepublic
We don’t need new laws. We need jurors that don’t believe that CSI is real.
9 posted on
07/06/2011 4:02:02 PM PDT by
Egon
(The difference between Theory and Practice: In Theory, there is no difference.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I am sure there are laws already existing that could have been used but prosecutor wanted the grab gold ring. Laws written in response to events like this have been often poorly written and overturned by courts. Phrases like “or should have known” will not stand in court.
15 posted on
07/06/2011 4:13:40 PM PDT by
ThomasThomas
(I am still looking for that box I am supposed to think out of.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
To: afraidfortherepublic
When I read the headline I felt fear but after reading the story I gotta say, this sounds like a good idea.
19 posted on
07/06/2011 4:27:02 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: afraidfortherepublic
Here in Houston we have a whacked out mom that drowns her 5 kids in a bathtub, and she gets SYMPATHY.
So I have trouble understanding why everyone is so bloodthirsty for this mom...after all, she only killed one person.
20 posted on
07/06/2011 4:30:27 PM PDT by
BobL
(PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I’m surprised that this isn’t already in the statutes. That said, this one is a no-brainer.
21 posted on
07/06/2011 4:33:08 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(From her lips to the voters' ears: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "We own the economy" June 15, 2011)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I guess next your say we should turn our kids over to the state to raise
22 posted on
07/06/2011 4:38:53 PM PDT by
jrd
To: afraidfortherepublic
It would not have helped Caylee...she was already dead. It will not fix anything. Feel good legislation, nothing more.
HEADS UP! Anthony’s attorney on Shep next.
To: afraidfortherepublic
You mean the jury found her not guilty because there was no law specifically addressing her actions?
What she did was already illegal. We don’t new laws for every possible detail of every possible crime.
24 posted on
07/06/2011 4:42:32 PM PDT by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: afraidfortherepublic; retrokitten; wideawake; stainlessbanner; nmh; driftdiver; ...
28 posted on
07/06/2011 4:51:07 PM PDT by
WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
(Going into Rehab means never having to say you are sorry....)
To: afraidfortherepublic
While we're at it, why don't we pass a law making it more of a crime to assault or murder a homosexual. Homosexuals are only 1% of the population, but if it saves one life the law is worth it. I know! We could call it a hate crime law! Yeah, that's the ticket- oh. . . wait. . .
34 posted on
07/06/2011 5:05:56 PM PDT by
goodwithagun
(My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Why another law? so they can acquit somebody else of another law. The aggravated child abuse statute already makes it a crime to act in a way that causes harm to your child. The jury ignored it. Many freepers ignore it as well. So just WTH is the point?
40 posted on
07/06/2011 5:19:08 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
Pretty sad to see so many “conservatives” buying all the hype and condoning a new nanny state law.
41 posted on
07/06/2011 5:19:46 PM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Morgan at Cowpens.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Wouldn’t that fall under child neglect? We have enough laws. They just need to be enforced.
To: afraidfortherepublic
Casey is just crazy enough that she’d show up for the bills signing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson