Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Ron

It’s a circumstantial case! I’m absolutely sick of your kind of excuse! Circumstantial means you HAVE to use Common Sense, if that even exists in this country any longer! It doesn’t mean you have to have prove what happened. I’m so pissed off with views like yours. There was a preponderance of circumstanlial evidense in this case, much, much, more than the evidense that sent Scott Peterson to death row.


2,017 posted on 07/05/2011 6:03:08 PM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1877 | View Replies ]


To: Alissa

Democrats from Pinellas County have no common sense. Wow. We should have known this was gonna happpen from the beginning. From when they picked a juror who “could not judge”. What?????


2,021 posted on 07/05/2011 6:06:30 PM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2017 | View Replies ]

To: Alissa
It’s a circumstantial case! I’m absolutely sick of your kind of excuse! Circumstantial means you HAVE to use Common Sense,

You mean like who is the best salesmen in the courtroom and can sway the jury to agree with your case? PROOF, WHO NEEDS PROOF? I THINK IT THEREFORE I AM!

That is how you want people convicted?

Hey, hehe, that SOB looks guilty as **** lets throw him in the slammer!!! Yeah, that's the ticket.

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt???? WTF is that???

We don't need that stinking Constitution when it fits MY needs and opinions.

So now common sense is the standard for convictions.......right on FReeper!!

2,031 posted on 07/05/2011 6:12:05 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Woah, Obama will appease Trump, but not Lakin? Thanks LSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2017 | View Replies ]

To: Alissa; Las Vegas Ron; Recovering Ex-hippie; screaminsunshine
It doesn’t mean you have to have prove what happened.

Well, from that, we can conclude that you, Alissa, don't really believe that following the law is important.

And what a splendid way of saving money....let's just get rid of that "innocent until proven guilty" principle!

There was a preponderance of circumstanlial evidense in this case, [...]

Fine.
That will get you a Grand Jury indictment, or a family court judgement.

But this was a criminal trial. The standard of evidence is above "preponderance of the evidence"...and it's even beyond "clear and convincing evidence" or "Clear, Unequivocal, Satisfactory, and Convincing Evidence", etc.

Those are lower standards than what the law (oh, that pesky "law" thing again!) prescribes for this criminal trial, where a person's liberty (and even life) is at stake.


Circumstantial evidence is fine and common sense is fine, just like evaluating veracity of witnesses is fine. But the highest standard of proof is still required--throughout this great land of America...state to state, even in Florida.

2,352 posted on 07/05/2011 11:54:32 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2017 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson