You mean like who is the best salesmen in the courtroom and can sway the jury to agree with your case? PROOF, WHO NEEDS PROOF? I THINK IT THEREFORE I AM!
That is how you want people convicted?
Hey, hehe, that SOB looks guilty as **** lets throw him in the slammer!!! Yeah, that's the ticket.
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt???? WTF is that???
We don't need that stinking Constitution when it fits MY needs and opinions.
So now common sense is the standard for convictions.......right on FReeper!!
With that type of logic, hardly anyone would get convicted. According to you, as long as there is no conclusive DNA evidence, they get to walk. Jurors should absolutely use common sense. Unfortunately, it’s not that common.
You're disgusting. That wasn't what I was saying. You should just join the "it makes me feel good jurors." Common sense needs to be used in a circumstantial case. And I guess if no one sees you commit murder and you get rid of all evidense, which wasn't the case in this situation, then you can't be convicted, There was plenty of evidense and if you're intelligent enough to put 2 & 2 together it should have been a guilty verdict.