Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/04/2011 3:07:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Well it’s the change they voted for.


2 posted on 07/04/2011 3:12:19 PM PDT by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

With the new mooslimb outreach programs and projects to prove man is causing global warming, there are huge opportunities at NASA. Unfortunately, none of them involve aeronautics or space flight.


3 posted on 07/04/2011 3:12:19 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“We’re not adrift,” he said. “And the vision is not gone. And we have a plan. We have a very sound plan.”- NASA Administrator Charles Bolden

Hey Charlie, maybe you should let us everyday workers know what the plan is. Because from our view, all we see is layoffs and project mismanagement by power hungry managers.

Our morale can’t be low. We have no morale to be low. We have thousands of highly skilled engineers just sitting around wanting to work.

GIVE US A MISSION!!!!


4 posted on 07/04/2011 3:16:13 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

NASA has been declining since LBJ and Nixon. The good news is the very successful unmanned program, and private companies that will be developing manned rockets and space stations.


5 posted on 07/04/2011 3:19:24 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The Space Shuttle is outdated equipment and technology and ending the program was a good idea.


6 posted on 07/04/2011 3:19:35 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Ironically we launched our first whole satellite this week. ORS. Smaller cheaper faster.
7 posted on 07/04/2011 3:25:03 PM PDT by McGruff (Why do they fear her so?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Does it still take fifty people to change a light bulb at NASA???


9 posted on 07/04/2011 3:31:46 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Last one to leave Brevard County turn out the lights!


11 posted on 07/04/2011 3:33:43 PM PDT by B-Cause (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

NASA will be able to devote more resources to help James Hansen predict immediate CAGW.


12 posted on 07/04/2011 3:34:25 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You’ll notice - everything the governments get involved with are inundated by lawyers, squeezing out the scientists and engineers who won’t put up with their political games. The ones that stay under the lawyers control ARE the B-Team!

I believe Challenger was a direct result of those political managers. RIP.


13 posted on 07/04/2011 3:36:36 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Not many of Eric Holder’s people are aeronautical engineers, or engineers of any kind, therefore NASA is of no use to Eric Holder’s people, and must be destroyed.


16 posted on 07/04/2011 3:41:00 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

A lot of us miss the old glory days, but with the moon reached and the ultra high maintenance shuttle done to death, and hard times upon all, what’s left for NASA? A handful of unmanned probes? I’ve heard of projects to try to clean up the space junk orbiting the earth.

I never did understand what Obama even ostensibly intended by this NASA-Muslim outreach. Do they wish to put sacred stones in orbit, or somefin?


18 posted on 07/04/2011 3:41:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

A nation can have a space program or a welfare society, but it can’t have both.


19 posted on 07/04/2011 3:41:54 PM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
7000! How many are filthy Democrat Affirmative Action do nothing, Know nothing hires?
22 posted on 07/04/2011 3:46:59 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Thirty years of manned space technology down the drain!

You just don't turn engineering back on after you turn it off. Engineering isn't a step function. Many processes in high tech cannot be put on a drawing or documented. Many times they remain in the brains of people that are being laid off.

In your lifetime you will probably never see a U.S. launched manned vehicle again. No American exceptionalism. I think that is what motivates Obummer.

No commercial company is going to do this. The liability insurance would put them out of business before the first launch.

28 posted on 07/04/2011 4:04:16 PM PDT by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
With the Shuttle Program Ending, Fears of Decline at NASA

There is no need to fear, the decline is already fully accomplished.

29 posted on 07/04/2011 4:06:26 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Holy flippin' crap, Sarah rocks the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They need to shift gears. Reduce the manned flight operation to a skeleton crew. Keep a crew of a few young astronauts who you send into space every 5 years or so to keep their skills up.

The rest of the program ought to be robotic. Send robots to the moon to develop infrastructure for an eventual return to the moon by men. Build a moon base and fabrication facilities.

That approach would also have the advantage of stimulating our nascent robotics industry.


30 posted on 07/04/2011 4:06:42 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes, NASA needs to rethink its mission, and some stuff needs to go to the private sector - notably the routine stuff. However, I see NASA’s new mission going in a bad direction.
That would be the direction of navel gazing, and the never ending heavy head trip, lead by non-engineering/non-science types. I do not consider the AGW people to be among the science types, since the AGW’s have gone Lysenko on us. No exploration will get done, no data gathering since that may challenge the dogma of James Hansen spewing that humanity is a virus infecting Earth Mother Goddess Gaia.
Hansen is no scientist, he is now a priest of the AGW cult.


31 posted on 07/04/2011 4:07:12 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Space is silly. Billions of Muslims need attention and THAT’S the job of NASA.


39 posted on 07/04/2011 4:14:32 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Ought to be a moon mission /colony and a Mars manned mission but Obama hates American greatness and doesn’t want us striving for anything that makes us lead...that’s the bottom line...he hates us.


42 posted on 07/04/2011 4:16:29 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson