Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: smokingfrog
wonder what the line they will use when it crosses the average? it is getting closer and closer. Trend is down boys!
2 posted on
06/30/2011 7:56:23 PM PDT by
dila813
To: steelyourfaith
3 posted on
06/30/2011 7:56:23 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: smokingfrog
This is getting like baseball statistics.
To: smokingfrog
Carbon dioxide increased by 2.60 parts per million in the atmosphere in 2010Over 60% of this increase was due to the US President's constant bloviating, scientists say.
5 posted on
06/30/2011 8:00:39 PM PDT by
RockinRight
(Nobama 2012.)
To: smokingfrog
I don’t care if it warming or cooling ... we aren’t the cause and couldn’t change it either way if we tried.
TT
6 posted on
06/30/2011 8:01:46 PM PDT by
TexasTransplant
(Radical islam is real islam. Moderate islam is the trojan horse.)
To: smokingfrog
I think they just make up these climate change organizations. Probably two old queer professors that make up some data, make up some official sounding name and proclaim to be experts. A favorite progressive hustle!
7 posted on
06/30/2011 8:02:01 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: smokingfrog
8 posted on
06/30/2011 8:02:32 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: smokingfrog
In any case, it’s a good thing if true.
9 posted on
06/30/2011 8:03:40 PM PDT by
Hugin
("A man'll usually tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear it"--- Open Range)
To: smokingfrog
Seems fascinatng to me they can’t really point out a single devastationg consequence of all this warming, yet supposedly it’s causing a catastrophe.
10 posted on
06/30/2011 8:04:19 PM PDT by
Williams
(Honey Badger Don't Care)
To: smokingfrog
Explain to me (with a straight face if you can) why it rained all morning yesterday in Fresno. It was frickin' cold, too.
Climate changes for the colder will keep on coming.
11 posted on
06/30/2011 8:04:50 PM PDT by
stboz
To: smokingfrog
12 posted on
06/30/2011 8:05:32 PM PDT by
Vision
("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would http://see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
To: smokingfrog
The indicators DO NOT show unequivocally that the world continues to warm. This warming has stalled, at least for now, since about 2003.
The lower troposphere data (from both the RSS and UAH MSU) also do NOT SHOW unequivocally that the world continues to warm! Indeed, warming has also stalled since about 2002.
Global average (70 south to 82.5 north) lower tropospheric temperatures (from UAH)
13 posted on
06/30/2011 8:06:11 PM PDT by
sourcery
(If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
To: smokingfrog
14 posted on
06/30/2011 8:06:24 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama are not rivals, they're running mates." - Rep. Thaddeus McCotter)
To: smokingfrog
The Kings in Egypt kept control of the populace through the Priests who would ‘predict’ the flooding of the Nile, and attribute the flooding to the refusal of the ‘people’ to cooperate with the King’s wishes.
15 posted on
06/30/2011 8:08:54 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: smokingfrog
Saying there’s an “average” temperature of the earth is like saying that your house has an average color of paint over the years. When did this averaging of temperatures begin? What a pant load.
16 posted on
06/30/2011 8:10:27 PM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar)
To: smokingfrog
Is this finding based on the faked data we already know about or faked data we don’t know about?
To: smokingfrog
22 posted on
06/30/2011 8:15:19 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: smokingfrog
I am staggered by the ignorance of mathematics and the assumption on the part of these "scientists" that their hearers are equally stupid evidenced by making an assertion about the first derivative of a measurement ("global warming" means dT/dt > 0, where T is mean annual global temperature and t is time, say since 1900 in years), while offering as evidence for the assertion the statement that 86 ≤ t ≤ 111 implies T(t) > T̅, where T̅ is the mean value of T(t) for 0 ≤ T ≤ 100.
23 posted on
06/30/2011 8:17:56 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: smokingfrog
Apparently they missed the memo stating that there hasn't been any warming since at least 1995.
26 posted on
06/30/2011 8:29:15 PM PDT by
Major Matt Mason
(Government doesn't create jobs, it only creates expenses.)
To: smokingfrog
Go back 20,000 years, and we are way way above average now, like 6 C or more! Depends on what you pick for your interval. Go back a million years and we are way below average.
27 posted on
06/30/2011 8:30:24 PM PDT by
DBrow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson