Posted on 06/29/2011 12:21:04 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
So is that the only way a person can run for Secretary-General of the UN, a position which as far as I can tell is a lot of soapbox with very little actual clout? That is: to get nominated by the government of his or her home country? Otherwise Obama ought not to care if the next president is a Republican, he still can run for a UN post (from Kenya if he has to).
Obama=loser bore. Napolean’s creed. Good tools to take into life. I think Sarah Palin has taken to exercising this winning leadership much more than the loser Obama. Soon Obama will have no job.
I think this article might be on the right track
“You tell such breath-taking whoppers that normal people can’t imagine that you don’t believe a word of it yourself. Most people will believe in Big Lies more than little lies, if you repeat the Big Lies over and over again — and if you control the Organs of Propaganda.”
That was also discussed in The Overton Window by Glenn Beck.
BTT
“A reasonable guess is that Obama wants to be UN Secretary General.”
I’ve said that for a year or two now. It seems an obvious next step for him and his path to crush our country. It’s the final reason (of many, IMO) we should withdraw from the UN and tell them they have to meet somewhere else - off U.S. soil - from now on.
“To do that he needs two things: Radical Muslim support, and the international left, especially European socialists.”
They’re all his peeps - he’s Muslim, also a “citizen of the world”, and he’s molding our country into the European socialist model. (He hates our ally England, though, but that’s a personal thing going back to his daddy.)
Very good piece of writing - thanks, 2DV, for posting it!
B. Clinton thought he wanted that, too, until he saw all of the money out there with fewer strings and less work attached.
excellent column, but the “l’audace” quotation was not Napoleon, it was Georges Danton during the French Revolution:
“Il faut de l’audace, encore de l’audace, toujours de l’audace”
Doesn’t change the points of the Lewis column, but writers are always mis-attributing that quotation for some reason. Danton said it in a speech to the National Assembly, not so long before he himself became a candidate for the guillotine for being insufficiently pure in his extremism!!
(* - This assumes that Obama wouldn't try to get the job using his Kenyan credentials, or that he wouldn't aim to knock the U.S. off the UN Security Council while he's still sits in the Oval Office....)
I’ve said that for a year or so also but I’m not so sure it is Sec Gen of the UN.
There are those working on world government and it may be something other than the UN he/we are looking at.
I may be wrong but I have never thought he was going to run in 2012.
He has been smart enough to get most of it done in one term. He can call on Hillary, who is every bit the Marxist as he, to finish the job. They made a deal in 2008 if you remember.
Huh?
But it is a very important opinion piece because he has laid down several fundamental and key principles.
First he understands Obama as a narcissist which informs all his behavior from childhood through this administration.
Second, he understands that Obama is a Marxist and he understands that that, in turn, implies that he wants one world government, most likely through the United Nations.
Third, he understands that to a radical leftist such as Obama, the United States constitutes the principal obstacle to the achievement of one world government under socialist principles. Ancillary to that understanding is the idea that Israel and Great Britain as two very close allies of the United States also represent impediments to the accomplishment of that dream of one world rule and so they too should be undermined and disparaged.
Fourth, the fundamentalist Islamic jihad seeks the same intermediate goal as do the international radical socialists, the destruction of the United States of America as a significant impediment to one world rule. Incidentally, they regard the United States Constitution as a significant impediment to the destruction of the United States.
Fifth, the narcissism of Obama individually and leftists generally lead them to presume that in the end days after the destruction of the United States they will prevail over Islam. Islam presumes the converse. Both regard the other as useful idiots.
To some degree or other all Marxists are narcissists and that explains why there is such a ferocious infighting among them. Our job, if we wish to save the Republic, is to exploit that tendency.
Also, Patton was audacious because he was privy to the take from Ultra and sometimes knew the Germans' order of battle before Berlin did.
Easy to attack when you know exactly where your opponent is weak, according to their own communications. (He raised concern in the Allies' high command that he would compromise Ultra by being so unfailingly *right* in when and where to attack. Thank God the Germans never caught on, being so smug that they thought their code was unbreakable; and thank God for the Poles who helped bring to the West a knowledge of the machine and how it worked.)
Cheers!
I think Lewis summed up Bambi’s evil personality and his peculiar ability to mentally reconcile conflicting systems (the left and Islam) by focusing on the fact that they both have one thing in common, they hate the US and the modern world (as does Obama).
However, as Yossarian pointed out, he can’t be the UN Secy Genl if he runs from the US because a person from a country that sits on the Security Council can’t hold that position. It’s certainly possible that he could throw off all pretence once he is no longer president and just acknowledge his Kenyan or Indonesian citizenship, or possibly he could even convince the UN to change its rules for him. However, if the UN Secy Genl position is out, then what does he want?
I have also always thought that Obama saw the US presidency as simply a stepping stone on the way to something else, something “bigger,” but I can’t figure out what that something might be.
what a fight we have before us!
And of course, 0 has always been such a strict observer of eligibility requirements. ;)
First he understands Obama as a narcissist which informs all his behavior from childhood through this administration.
Not to quibble, but his childhood includes this administration.
Obama is a Marxist
I think more that 0 is a cynical pragmatist who embraces Marxism only because it advances himself to do so. He understands he could never advance in the conservative or libertarian camp on his own dubious merit, and therefore must fly the flag which empowers him as a minority. Once he gets where he wants to go, or if it ever hindered his progress, 0 would throw Marxism into the dustbin as readily as he does any 'close adviser' who becomes a liability.
the narcissism of Obama individually and leftists generally [The left presumes] that in the end days after the destruction of the United States they will prevail over Islam.
The left would do well to consider the experience the Weimar Republic had with trying to leverage an ideology to bring down a governemnt. It couldn't control the result in 1917, and the left will not be able to control the result, if they get what they hope for, in 20XX.
Will the Euro-socialists even have governments by 2017?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.