Posted on 06/28/2011 9:03:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
Are you supposed to have sex at work? I guess it depends on your profession, but for most of us the answer is “no.” Why then is corporate America obsessed with training about sex?
As described in several recent columns by Mike Adams, I was fired as a vendor by Cisco for my conservative beliefs about sex and marriage even though my beliefs were never expressed on the job. When a homosexual manager found out on the Internet that I had authored a book giving evidence that maintaining our current marriage laws would be best for society, he couldn’t tolerate me and requested I be fired. An HR executive canned me within hours without ever speaking to me. This happened despite the fact that the leadership and teambuilding programs I led always received high marks (even from the homosexual manager!).
How could an experienced HR professional commit such a blatant act of discrimination unless the Cisco culture was decidedly tilted left? Why didn’t Cisco’s relentless emphasis and training on “inclusion and diversity” serve to prevent this? Maybe it’s because “inclusion and diversity” means something different to corporate elites than to normal Americans. That’s why their training didn’t prevent the problem but actually created an environment of intolerance that led to the problem.
Cisco’s chief “Inclusion and Diversity” officer, Ms. Marilyn Nagel, had trouble on the phone defining what “inclusion and diversity” actually means at Cisco, so she sent me several links from the Cisco website. As in our conversation, I found no specific definition on the website but plenty of platitudes, such as Cisco is committed to “valuing and encouraging different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas.”
If that’s the case, then why not value my “perspectives, styles, thoughts and ideas?”
Because only certain perspectives, styles, thoughts and ideas are approved, you see. “Inclusion and diversity” to corporate elites actually means exclusion for those that don’t agree with the approved views. Whoops, there goes “diversity.”
Shouldn’t the real intent of Cisco’s value of “inclusion and diversity” be to ensure that people in that diverse workforce work together cordially and professionally even when they inevitably disagree on certain political, moral or religious questions? It would seem so. In a large multicultural workforce, people need to work together despite political or religious differences. That’s a noble and necessary goal. It’s totalitarian, however, to subject people to “diversity” training and corporate sponsorships that go beyond teaching respect for people to advocacy of what they do in bed.
All employees should treat one another with kindness and respect because they are fellow human beings, not because of their sexual behavior. If people are to be respected simply on the basis of their behavior, then none of us qualify for respect because we have all behaved badly on occasion.
So instead of trying to force all employees to accept any sexual behavior—especially something as controversial as homosexuality—the inclusion and diversity police should be urging us to treat all people with respect simply because we are human beings. That’s all you need to be productive at work anyway.
But as soon as you start telling people from different religious and cultural backgrounds what they must think about homosexuality, you will offend and create conflict andr resentment. As a Christian, I am commanded to respect all people. That’s what I was doing at Cisco. But don’t tell me that I have to respect and celebrate what people do in bed. Don’t tell me that I must violate my conscience or my God in order to make widgets. That’s not only immoral and un-American; it’s manipulative and stupid. How does accepting homosexual behavior have anything to do with job productivity? Are we supposed to have sex at work?
There simply is no business reason to judge my beliefs about sexual behavior or anyone else’s. And even if some corporate nanny could dream up a reason, it would not justify the assault on an employee’s conscience or religion.
Notice that Cisco did not have a problem with my behavior. My job performance was deemed excellent, and I was “inclusive and diverse” by working in a respectful manner with people of all moral, religious and political views.
Cisco had a problem with my thoughts. Although I certainly accepted homosexuals, I committed the thought crime of disagreeing with homosexual behavior and homosexual political goals. So despite all their talk about “inclusion and diversity,” Cisco deemed my thoughts about something irrelevant to the workplace as grounds for immediate exclusion. Do you think they would have excluded me if I had pro-same-sex marriage thoughts? Of course not—that’s an approved view that Cisco actually sponsors (even though they deny it).
But people who don’t accept homosexual behavior don’t have to work at Cisco then!
True, they don’t. But if Cisco or any other company wants to make it a requirement that every employee and vendor personally accept the behavior of homosexuality or homosexual political goals such as same-sex marriage, then tell us directly. Broadcast it to the world. Cisco can’t and won’t because such a requirement would be a clear violation of the religious protections codified in the Civil Rights Act, and it would result in a mass exodus of employees and customers.
Instead, they create an oppressive culture of political correctness under the false banner of “inclusion and diversity” to achieve the same ends. They tell the world that they value and encourage “different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas” while they punish or intimidate into silence people who have “different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas.” While Cisco executives would never admit this, their actions reveal this twisted truth: Cisco values homosexual behavior more than honesty, freedom of religion and freedom of conscience.
Is it the same at your workplace? Are you tired of having to hide your conservative or religious beliefs as if you live in a totalitarian state rather than America? If you continue to cower in silence before an intolerant militant minority, it will only get worse. To paraphrase Edmund Burke, “All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.” It’s time to do something—speak up.
Shocked. Shocked I say. :-)
Can't stand the guy. He says "I" or "me" even more than our fearless leader. I watch his interviews and wonder if he's interviewing himself, or someone else.
I agree fully.
It's already there. Down by almost 1/2 in the past year or so. They made some pretty bad decisions (what the hell does a "Flip" camera have to do with network gear?) but they're divesting themselves of the issues.
Cisco is probably a pretty good investment right now. Social Commentary aside, the conventional wisdom in IT is that "No one ever got fired for buying Cisco, EMC, or IBM".
And, again - this story aside - I can vouch for the fact that Cisco employs an awful lot of solid conservatives. Smart network engineers don't grow on trees, and in general, don't graduate from "Liberal Studies" programs, either. :-)
“Tolerance: The inability to say Yes or No. The inability to take a stand.”- A Great Historian 1888. It is a constant demand that only the Christian white heterosexual male be “tolerant.” The dirty little secret is the fact that the coalition of blacks, homosexuals, alien invaders and non-christians, currently trying to gain control, are scared to death that white straight male will wake up and fight back. That fear is why one gets all these goofy acts and rules they are trying petty little terrors to aquire and maintain control. Time will tell whether or not they will succeed.
Confirmiong once again that ‘Cisco’ is Spanish for ‘bend over’.
I work in a hospital and believe me with all them hot nurses running around I would love to have sex at work. DUCKING MY WIFES SHOE! Missed me Bi-—!
The day is coming...and it won't be pretty. There is a limit to patience and the buffeting of constant abuse. You don't want to be on the wrong end of that disagreement.
Well...that's true of pretty much any technical support. :-)
I've generally had good dealings with them, but I've worked within enterprise-level agreements. I'm getting the top engineers, not just phone-answerers and script-readers.
Dell is much the same way. If you call in on your home PC, you'll get India or China and their solutions are always half baked (You already reboot? Oh. Well please to wait while I ask supervisor....). They put all of their top American techs on the Server-level (corporate-type) teams, and for the most part, these guys are pretty decent.
Ain't saying that it's right, I'm just saying what they do. Makes sense to put their top staff where the money is, figure that I just placed a business order for $75K worth of Dell equipment, and that's not an infrequent occurrence. I doubt that I'll buy $75K worth of home PC equipment in my entire lifetime.
I am offended by the constant promotion of homosexuality by my employer. It creates an atmosphere of intimidation and intolerance for my religious beliefs. I don’t believe it is the role of a business to extol ANY particular sexual activity. It is a BUSINESS after all!
Where do I go to file my complaint?
I’m with you. I hope He comes down and ends it tonight.
You know what though? It could get so much worse than what it is now. Travel in a third world country or get a load of what The Final Solution looked like in Germany in the 30’s and 40’s.
It’s going to get a whole lot worse.
So much of it, truly, is just becoming disposable. I saw mini-laptops at Target just the other day, on sale for $149. At that price, it's cheaper to throw away than have fixed, or even waste your own time on fixing.
Amazing, to me at least. First "portable" that I worked on weighed 50-75 lbs and sold for upwards of 5 grand. It was portable, only in the broadest sense of the word, lol. Needed two men and a small gorilla to move the thing around.
Hehehe..you said blow-back...hehehe...
Sorry, couldn’t resist.
Ah, the Compaq “luggable” with the keyboard that fastened over the screen. I used one in law school (mid-80s) and was one of very few people who had access to a computer. My dad, who graduated a few years before I did, bought an IBM PC for ten grand when they first came out because he was a one-man office. A great head start in those days.
Colonel, USAFR
What happened to the Zampolit on the Red October?
I say make Cisco pay for their left wing “political correctness” Nazism. Try to spread the word and hurt their business model. Their “diversity” policy is aimed only at the sodomites and those who defy the very God of nature. It’s gone too far, folks. Ann Coulter says that liberalism is a mental illness and we are the only ones with a cure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.