DB, there’s so much confusion in your posts that it’s pointless to continue this.
I haven’t defended one fourth amendment violation. I have explained ways to counter what I believe to be Fourth Amendment infringements.
You say we don’t need police and then you say you actually do see a need for them. Your definition of what cities are, is just bazaar.
You may wish we could live like six people on an island, but it’s not that sensible laws help protect individual rights.
Your confusion lies that I have two threads. One thread is supporting the fourth amendment, the other thread of thought is my criticism of the way conservatives vote.
I want freedom. I don't want overlords. How is that confusing?