Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One in the eye for diabetes
Chemistry World ^ | 23 June 2011 | Elinor Richards

Posted on 06/24/2011 12:33:44 AM PDT by neverdem

A team in Canada has made a device that could be implanted behind the eye to release drugs on demand to treat retinal damage caused by diabetes. 

Diabetic retinopathy can lead to blindness. A current treatment is laser therapy, which is destructive and results in side effects, such as diminished side and night vision, and unwanted laser burns. Another therapy is to administer antiproliferative drugs, such as docetaxel (normally a cancer drug), but the compounds clear from the blood quickly, so high doses are needed to produce the desired effect, which increases toxicity to other tissues. 

Mu Chiao and colleagues from the University of British Columbia in Vancouver have made a device to be implanted behind the eye that releases drugs when triggered by an external magnet. This means that the device doesn't need a battery and lower doses can be used. Implantable devices have been made before but drug release is done by diffusion and the release rates can't be controlled, which is a problem if the dosage rate needs to be adjusted when a patient's condition changes. 

Device that releases drugs from behind the eye

The device is loaded with a drug then sealed with a polydimethylsiloxane membrane. Applying a magnetic field causes the membrane to deform, triggering the release of the drug.

The team made the device from a reservoir loaded with the drug, sealed by an elastic magnetic polydimethylsiloxane membrane. Applying a magnetic field causes the membrane to deform, triggering the release of the drug. 

The team loaded the device with docetaxel at a dosage suitable for treating diabetic retinopathy over 35 days and found that background leakage of the drug was negligible. They also monitored the drug's biological activity over time by testing it against two cell lines, including prostate cancer cells. They found that they were able to achieve reproducible release rates and the docetaxel retained its pharmacological efficacy for more than two months in the device. 

'The device is intended to improve the quality of life for patients suffering from chronic diseases,' says Chiao whose motivation was personal as he has family members that have diabetic retinopathy. 

'This is an interesting approach towards developing therapeutically useful ophthalmic delivery systems,' says John Tsibouklis who studies biomaterials and drug delivery at the University of Portsmouth in the UK. 'It represents a significant advance towards device based drug delivery.' 

Chiao hopes to pin down the exact medical applications for the device so that he can tailor the mechanical design to particular diseases. However, he does envisage challenges ahead, involving biocompatibility, performance optimisation and degree of controllability. 

 

 

Link to journal article

On-demand controlled release of docetaxel from a battery-less MEMS drug delivery device
Fatemeh Nazly Pirmoradi, John K. Jackson, Helen M. Burt and Mu Chiao, Lab Chip, 2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1lc20134d

Also of interest

Eye

Drug delivery to the eye

02 August 2006

Scientists say biodegradable polymer nanoparticles show great promise as drug delivery devices for the eye.


Magnetic nanoparticle-vesicle assemblies releasing their contents

Magnets control drug release

30 March 2009

A smart tissue-like biomaterial that can release drugs in response to a magnetic trigger has been created by UK scientists


Expanded hydrogel nanoparticle

Nanoparticles give cancer drug a boost

19 February 2009

Efficiency of Taxol improved by encapsulating it in a polymer nanoparticle


Drug delivery device for the eye

An eye for drug delivery

09 June 2008

Patients with glaucoma and related eye diseases could soon be treated with a refillable drug delivery device - replacing the need for injections into the eyeball.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: diabetes; diabeticretinopathy; drugdeliverysystems; medicine
Inserting foreign bodies in a population already considered immunocompromised can be problematic, but why it be more more problematic than other implants escapes me. This method looks to be quite promising.
1 posted on 06/24/2011 12:33:50 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Inserting foreign bodies in a population already considered immunocompromised can be problematic, but why it would be more more problematic than other implants escapes me.

Ugh!

2 posted on 06/24/2011 12:42:56 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinmark; FreedomCalls; IslandJeff; JRochelle; MarMema; Txsleuth; Newtoidaho; texas booster; ...
FReepmail me if you want on or off the diabetes ping list.
3 posted on 06/24/2011 12:45:47 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Innovative!


4 posted on 06/24/2011 1:11:04 AM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; decimon; Smokin' Joe; Judith Anne
*PING*!

(Thanks, neverdem!)

Cheers!

5 posted on 06/24/2011 3:48:27 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

save


6 posted on 06/24/2011 4:50:28 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Cool! Thanks for the ping.


7 posted on 06/24/2011 5:48:22 AM PDT by upchuck (Think you know hardship? Ha! Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

There are already implantable pumps on the market that are more controllable and have made it through FDA. They would just need to verify the pump is compatible with the drug and how to implant the catheter close to the eye.


8 posted on 06/24/2011 7:35:41 AM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

>> “A team in Canada has made a device that could be implanted behind the eye to release drugs on demand to treat retinal damage caused by diabetes.” <<

.
But why not use effective treatments to cure the retnal problem (there are several, from nutritional to FSM therapy) instead of the invasive approach?


9 posted on 06/24/2011 10:50:00 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theKid51; Apple Blossom

ping


10 posted on 06/24/2011 11:04:29 AM PDT by bmwcyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; austinmark; FreedomCalls; IslandJeff; JRochelle; MarMema; Txsleuth; Newtoidaho; ...
But why not use effective treatments to cure the retnal problem (there are several, from nutritional to FSM therapy) instead of the invasive approach?

I searched "FSM therapy" "diabetic retinopathy" on Yahoo.

Nada. Ditto Google.

Facts About Diabetic Retinopathy A pretty good primer on the topic

For example, researchers are studying drugs that may stop the retina from sending signals to the body to grow new blood vessels. Someday, these drugs may help people control their diabetic retinopathy and reduce the need for laser surgery.

If they can't block the retinal signal, then maybe they can find an inhibitor of endothelial stem cells to block angiogenesis. As it looks now, all they have is lasers to fry the blood vessels and surgery for vitrectomy, IMHO.
11 posted on 06/24/2011 3:46:01 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There are SEVERAL causes of the condition ~ retinopathy. They are all dealt with in different ways ~ some are more successful, some are less.

You do lose a lot of your night vision (and the color "blue") with the laser treatment ~ and a couple of other types of treatments.

All treatments don't work with all causes.

12 posted on 06/24/2011 3:55:01 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Doc... you sure have a way of getting me excited over all of this new stuff.


13 posted on 06/24/2011 4:04:09 PM PDT by Gator113 ("GAME ON." I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There are SEVERAL causes of the condition ~ retinopathy.

On the diabetes ping list, why would I address any other kind?

14 posted on 06/24/2011 5:38:29 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Because even diabetics can have hereditary macular degeneration.


15 posted on 06/24/2011 6:09:09 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson