Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atlas Is Shrugging In The US And Flexing His Muscles Elsewhere
American Thinker ^ | June 23, 2011 | Monty Pelerin

Posted on 06/23/2011 5:30:04 PM PDT by rob777

Ayn Rand was mostly correct when she wrote her magnum opus "Atlas Shrugged." She was incorrect in one important area. She assumed the final option for the wealthy and entrepreneurial class was to go on "strike" and retire to Galt's Gulch. In the modern world the movers and shakers don't strike, they migrate.

Atlas is shrugging in the US. Capital is relocated to regions where it is treated more favorably. Within the country, we see capital and jobs leaving the overtaxed, overregulated Blue states and migrating to smaller government Red states. That provides partial relief, but onerous federal policies cannot be avoided by moving within the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: rob777
She was incorrect in one important area. She assumed the final option for the wealthy and entrepreneurial class was to go on "strike" and retire to Galt's Gulch. In the modern world the movers and shakers don't strike, they migrate.

Dumb observation. This is fiction writing and can not be judged "incorrect." Absurd.

21 posted on 06/23/2011 7:22:04 PM PDT by Misterioso (A liberal is a communist, but too stupid to realize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Make them listen to that silliness long enough, the terrorists might start talking as much as Hank Rearden does in his infamous speech.

Could you kindly be a little more specific as to Rearden's infamous speech? I wasn't aware he delivered one in Atlas. John Galt, yes, and perhaps Francisco D'Anconia, but not Rearden.

22 posted on 06/23/2011 7:50:45 PM PDT by Texas Mulerider (Rap music: hieroglyphics with a beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

“What prudent merchant will hazard his fortunes in any new branch of commerce when he knows not that his plans may be rendered unlawful before they can be executed?”

James Madison.

even Madison understood capitalists


23 posted on 06/23/2011 8:27:10 PM PDT by griswold3 (Character is destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
If ol' Atlas is so shortsighted to think the grass is greener on the other side, we're better off if he takes his moving and shaking and search for slave labor elsewhere.

Read the book before you make unfounded assumptions and irrational comments. If you cannot do that, go back to DU and DK where I am sure you are welcome.

24 posted on 06/23/2011 11:18:20 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister
Read the book before you make unfounded assumptions and irrational comments. If you cannot do that, go back to DU and DK where I am sure you are welcome.

I would not be welcomed at DU. It is a site that is very positive toward atheism and abortion. Unlike Ayn Rand, I am neither an atheist nor in favor of "a woman's right to choose".

25 posted on 06/24/2011 3:38:40 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Madison was right, but I think fortunes are still safer here than elsewhere. and all things equal, the natural human feeling of national loyalty will keep most folks tied to the homeland long after mere economic logic would suggest a move.


26 posted on 06/24/2011 3:44:22 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Texas Mulerider
Could you kindly be a little more specific as to Rearden's infamous speech? I wasn't aware he delivered one in Atlas. John Galt, yes, and perhaps Francisco D'Anconia, but not Rearden.

I stand corrected. Rearden's speech wasn't infamous at all. It didn't even exist! I give credit to Hank for keeping his mouth shut then. A Rand character with the good sense not to drone on is a rare bird indeed.

27 posted on 06/24/2011 3:49:59 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Even outside the civil war threads, your leftist panties are showing.

Bottom line is those who are and have been working hard are tired of footing the bill of those slugs who wish not to. Which part of your liberal mind doesn't understand that?

28 posted on 06/24/2011 3:53:15 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texas Mulerider
Could you kindly be a little more specific as to Rearden's infamous speech? I wasn't aware he delivered one in Atlas. John Galt, yes, and perhaps Francisco D'Anconia, but not Rearden

Mulerider, this tool and his buddy N/S, have made a career here bending the truth to fit their point of view. Not surprising.

29 posted on 06/24/2011 3:57:13 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
u haven't read Atlas Shrugged. How is it you have an opinion?

In a message board situation, ignorance is not an obstacle to expressing an opinion. In fact, it often seems to promote it. My issue is not with free enterprise, just Rand's atheism and the belief that Rand's selfishness is equivalent to the beneficial role of self-interest. We don't have to have Rand's contempt for the rest of humanity to be productive and to promote our own individual prosperity.

30 posted on 06/24/2011 4:00:42 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Bottom line is those who are and have been working hard are tired of footing the bill of those slugs who wish not to. Which part of your liberal mind doesn't understand that?

Rand was an atheist who was OK with abortion. That does not sound like a conservative to me. Her philosophy was built on atheism. Surely the case for free enterprise is strong enough so we do not have to rely on an atheistic philosopher and her atheistic philosophy.

31 posted on 06/24/2011 4:06:21 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
In a message board situation, ignorance is not an obstacle to expressing an opinion.

A notable observation...

32 posted on 06/24/2011 4:07:51 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Again you are throwing a NS quip into the mix. We are talking about the philiosphy of A/S, not the lifestyle of the author. Unless you can you explain how going Galt translates into atheism and pro choice.


33 posted on 06/24/2011 4:22:42 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
From what I've read about objectivism, atheism is at the heart of her philosophy and not incidental to it. I had this same discussion with my brother and his wife who returned from the theater with fervent praise for the Atlas movie and they didn't believe me either.
34 posted on 06/24/2011 4:31:55 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Again. Answer my question. Specifically how does "Going Galt" translate into a pro choice atheistic philosophy?

I am not saying Rand may have had other thoughts, but I am not seeing that in A/S. Was it a short term conservative epihipany, maybe so, but equating other peripheral ideas to this particular prose, is flat our wrong.

35 posted on 06/24/2011 4:38:26 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rob777

It has been some years since reading Rand but I believe that she was against any religion or followers who blindly followed without thinking. It wasn’t so much religion per say but the blindly following she objected to. Since her philosophy was based on what is best for self it makes sense, like it’s OK to believe in a higher power but if you give up your worldly possessions or strap on a suicide belt it is wrong to self.


36 posted on 06/24/2011 4:48:14 AM PDT by shoff (Cuomo is going to change the NY state motto from Excelsior to elixir (cause we bought it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Again. Answer my question. Specifically how does "Going Galt" translate into a pro choice atheistic philosophy?

When talking about the action itself, I have to say that it doesn't. People do have the natural right to be sovereign over their own efforts. It's the underlying philosophy, not the idea that people should be their own master under God that I object to in objectivism.

37 posted on 06/24/2011 4:54:26 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rob777
Another great Monty article

Russia, the new Capitalism You betcha.

38 posted on 06/24/2011 5:09:03 AM PDT by Daffynition ("Don't just live your life, but witness it also.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TxDas

I Prefer purging.

For a start, purge everything north and east of Manhattan


39 posted on 06/24/2011 5:23:05 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rob777; Republican Extremist; Boucheau; betsyross60; kalee; shezza; fanfan; wfu_deacons; ...

This is a ping list for those who've decided to stop feeding the beast. Let me know if you'd like to be added to the Atlas Shrugged Ping list.

40 posted on 06/24/2011 6:00:29 AM PDT by jellybean (Bookmark http://altfreerepublic.freeforums.org/index.php for when FR is down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson