Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rochester (NY) Woman Arrested For Videotaping Traffic Stop
Copyright © 2011 Finger Lakes Daily News ^ | 6/23/2011 7:01:41 AM

Posted on 06/23/2011 8:26:54 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

Mayor Tom Richards released a statement Wednesday afternoon, which says he has seen the video of Emily Good's arrest last month. Good was arrested while she was videotaping police conducting a traffic stop in front of her home.

The video has been posted on YouTube.

Good was charged with obstruction of governmental administration.

(Excerpt) Read more at fingerlakesdailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; US: New York
KEYWORDS: butforvideo; crime; donutwatch; emilygood; newyork; police; portcharles; rochester; rochesterpd; videotaping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Lazamataz

Oh snap! (literally)


41 posted on 06/23/2011 9:21:47 AM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mfish13
Not. A police officer when making an arrest does not want anybody behind him, in that close of proximity to him. Ask any one.

Tough titties. He's in a closely packed neighborhood.

Unless you want full-scale evacuations of entire areas whenever the bubble-lights go on, yer just gonna have to freakin' cope.

42 posted on 06/23/2011 9:22:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Oh, sorry about your broken leg, but you were "resisting".

LOL! And refusing to "calm down".
43 posted on 06/23/2011 9:22:58 AM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
charged with obstruction of governmental administration

That has got to be the vaguest, most BS charge I've heard yet.

So now I can be arrested at the DMV for disagreeing with the clerk?

44 posted on 06/23/2011 9:28:53 AM PDT by GunsAndBibles (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mfish13

You are correct about the close proximity and behind. However, I am friends with many LEO’s. I haven’t heard one yet say this guy was right. All said that he was within his rights to ask her to move - back but most of my friends felt that was even a power play. The officer was turned toward the lady taking the video most of the time.


45 posted on 06/23/2011 9:34:16 AM PDT by ninergold3 (Let Go and Let God - He IS In Control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

I viewed the video that is posted on YouTube, and I find it confirms the woman’s story, and not the police officer’s claims.

None of us, you included, know what she said before rolling tape, but your conclusion about that fact is a non sequitur.


46 posted on 06/23/2011 9:34:37 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GunsAndBibles
That has got to be the vaguest, most BS charge I've heard yet.

Any rational, reasonable, logical person that is not mentally deficient would see it that way.
47 posted on 06/23/2011 9:34:58 AM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I’d say it is a bad thing every time in this situation.

Law Enforcement Code of Ethics

As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve
mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against
deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful
against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all
men to liberty, equality and justice.

I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain
courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop
self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in
thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in
obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department.
Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided in me in
my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in
the performance of my duty.

I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices,
animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise
for crime and the relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law
courteously and appropriately without fear of favor, malice or ill will, never
employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities.

I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I
accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the
police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals,
dedicating myself before God to my chosen profession...law enforcement.


48 posted on 06/23/2011 9:36:59 AM PDT by King_Corey (www.kingcorey.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
We don't know what SHE said to the Police BEFORE she started taping. It wasn't "Have a nice day" or the police wouldn't have said, "Your comment concerns me and I'm not comfortable having you stand behind me".

Quite possibly, she had said absolutely nothing before switching on the recorder, but the "clever" policeman thought that it would make a good "sound bite" to say that anyway!

Regards,

49 posted on 06/23/2011 9:37:27 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Not just the city, but the cop himself, needs to be sued, and held civily if not criminally liable.


50 posted on 06/23/2011 9:41:29 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
Here's a case from Wahpeton, ND. Leftist punk but in this case he was doing nothing wrong.

YouTube

51 posted on 06/23/2011 9:46:48 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Glenn Beck spent a long time playing the audio version of this tape on his radio show Wednesday morning.


52 posted on 06/23/2011 9:55:38 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Palin / West in 2012 or West / Palin. Either combination will serve America well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
Not sure why the police were afraid.

The cop was not afraid. He kept saying "I don't feel safe...." which a key phrase (I assume) for authorizing him to do what he did. It's like saying "I felt my life was in danger." after a gun fight to establish a need for self defense. He was basically annoyed by her video taping and gave himself a procedural excuse to do what he did.

53 posted on 06/23/2011 10:16:06 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: straps
how about straight up fired?

he is a typical asshole. They have existed throughout history, where do you think Roman soldiers who beat and killed Christ, Nazi Brown Shirts and members of Saddam’s Republican Guards came from.

This guy and ALL the officers at the scene should lose their jobs and pensions TODAY! Their supervisor, if not on scene, should be demoted after he serves a month long unpaid suspension. If on scene he should also be fired.

It is high time the government was forced, at all levels,to treat the public with proper respect.

54 posted on 06/23/2011 10:17:31 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ninergold3
She had every right to refuse his request to move. She was on her own private property with no intention or desire to obstruct his actions. Witnessing and recording the actions of the police is the right of all citizens.

The government and their apparatchiks are out of control at every level.

55 posted on 06/23/2011 10:23:04 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

It doesn’t matter what she said.

The First Amendment trumps poor widdle poweece feewings that might get hurt or challenges to what some thug with a badge thinks is his authority.

Cops who do this need to be fired and they, their departments and cities successfully sued. Then maybe this would stop and these JBTs would think twice before harassing the citizenry.


56 posted on 06/23/2011 11:24:17 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (Can you afford to board the Chattanooga Choo-Choo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Slambat

It just keeps getting worse! Why in God’s name would anyone really want to be a cop? Life on the line every day, next to nothing for a yearly salary, (sure decent bennies and Ret. considerations), loved ones in constant worry over their well being etc, etc, etc. Why be a cop? Your ideas nailed it Slam.


57 posted on 06/23/2011 5:32:35 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Slambat

It just keeps getting worse! Why in God’s name would anyone really want to be a cop? Life on the line every day, next to nothing for a yearly salary, (sure decent bennies and Ret. considerations), loved ones in constant worry over their well being etc, etc, etc. Why be a cop? Your ideas nailed it Slam.


58 posted on 06/23/2011 5:32:38 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Hieronymus; VampireStateNY; governsleastgovernsbest; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; ...
All charges have been dismissed and she says she plans to sue.
59 posted on 06/27/2011 1:46:34 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
She'll be Good and Rich!
60 posted on 06/27/2011 1:52:06 PM PDT by b4its2late ("Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson