Posted on 06/22/2011 9:47:39 PM PDT by RED SOUTH
Bachmann wrote the letter urging the president to pardon Vennes for his 1987 conviction on federal money laundering, illegal firearm sales and cocaine distribution charges. He was sentenced to five years in federal prison.
Vennes, has been a major financial contributor to Bachmann since 2005. Was Bachmanns letter in support of Vennes presidential pardon a quid pro quo for Vennes largesse? Until Bachmann releases her original letter, the motivation behind it wont be known. Bachmann chief of staff Michele Marston told Minnesota Independent Monday that Were trying to track down a copy of that letter."
The problem you need to worry about are all the people not posting because of folks like you. Believe me. There are a ton of them. There are over 300 million people in America. I know they are all on board with you. Can you sense it?/sarc
Tell me, do you keep your FReeper PDS folks I am supposed to hate list on your Mom’s blackboard near the washer and dryer next to your ‘puter?
Talk about sick.
After this revelation of yours, so revealing it is, I can only pity you. I did notice that very few of you exist on their own without help from another. Very telling that is.
But...it is humorous.
You'd better get back to that cult of yours, they miss you.......
Since you have run out of steam can I make a request for mercy fom you?
Please do not send that list to Santa. I ain’t all that bad.
I need toyz too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S9ecXWCBCc
Since you pinged me again, I thought you should know.
Enjoy the ride with the cultists. Don't chant too much though, I've read it hurts your ability to think.......
You will never understand Sharkey, the reason you won’t is because you have made up your mind.
You see, I have posted here many times that I will accept and abide by the nominee we choose. If that is Palin, Bachmann, either one, they will get my vote. That is far more than I get from some of you that rail on that if Palin isn’t the nominee, they will write her name in and burn the whole damn house down because they didn’t get their way.
That might make some feel like they are gettin’ back at those folks, but the joke will be on them. 5 years more of Obama and it will be over.
I has never been up to you or any of the people that are not on your shit list. It is always the job of the potential candidate to not just bask in the love of the believers, but to listen to those not on baord and make the sale. I have no problem at all with Sarah Palin entering this race, competing and making the sale.
Trying to force and bully people never works, which is one of Obamas’s problems now. It got him elected, but it has not served him well in the long run.
You can insult, hate me, get me banned and all that, but it won’t get rid of me and those that are like me.
It never was your job to do the work and make the sale. I have no problem with Palin making her case, who knows, she might change my mind. She has every right as Bachmann did to be a candidate.
Have a nice evening, I am sure going to make the effort.
I would support Bachmann and a few others.
I’m still keeping my options open, and I think it’s too early for another tactic.
I’m not a fan of Rollins. I don’t think it was a good idea to hire him. I think his comments while based on historical events, were none the less unfortunate. His track record over the last fifteen years or so was dismal at best, severely flawed at worst.
What he said is out there in political circles. When it’s our candidate that negative comments are made about, it sucks. None the less His comments are going to look very tame by mid-October 2012. The Democrats will make sure of that.
Going by the Bill Clinton strategy of getting the negatives out there early enough for folks to chew on it and dismiss it, this may not be all that bad anyway.
Rollins, Gergen, and I’m sure we could think of a few others who go back to the Reagan days, and went south since. Once in a while someone suggests they would be someone who could help with a national campaign, and somebody buys off on it. I wish Michelle hadn’t, but that’s not too be totally unexpected. We study up on Rollins and other nincompoops. Michelle doesn’t. She asks around if anyone knows someone who could help. Someone suggests Rollins and they’re off to the races.
There are so few good Conservatives in W., D. C., that this is bound to happen.
As I understand it, Michelle did ask Rawlins to apologize. If she did, it’s my take she probably had more words than that with him.
I think this is a bit overblown. Some will totally dismiss Michelle because of it. I won’t be joining them.
“her lack of rigid ideology?”
Anyone without a ridgid ideology is human waste!
I like Michele! After her debate performance, and the praise that Chris Matthews heaped on her, you had to know this was coming.
I’m glad they are getting it out of the way so early.
Thanks for the clarification...i agree
First we must defeat Romney and other moderates and then Obama
There has never been a more ripe time since 1980
But the stakes even higher...
I have been watching Bachmann activity for a number of years now. I can’t remember even one time where I disagreed with her. Now I see you and other people interpreting everything she does by the worst possible filter. Why are you folks so damned determined to take down one of the few people I’ve seen in Washington, D.C., who sees things like I do, like Conservatives do?
What is the driving force behind you? Why are you so determined to destroy her?
Watching you attack her like this says more about you to me than it does about her. I’ve watched her for years and know nothing about you except you are determined to destroy someone I know to be a good Conservative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.