Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video shows saggy pants dispute aboard plane in SF
Associated Press ^ | June 18, 2011 | SUDHIN THANAWALA

Posted on 06/18/2011 3:14:13 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Bearshouse

http://hitdanback.com/ has a couple of interesting complaints about USAirways and their dresscode or non-dresscode. The only dresscode they claim is one for non-revenue passage. When it comes to paying passengers there is none ~ or not one I would call a dresscode. There are numerous websites saying there’s no dresscode for any of the airlines EXCEPT non-rev.


41 posted on 06/18/2011 7:17:37 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bearshouse
In the end the airline is a private business and they can set rules or refuse service.

Yeah. And we're told that it is the airlines that request genital screening of particular passengers. All I can say to that is a big BS.

ML/NJ

42 posted on 06/18/2011 7:39:19 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: livius
That said, why in the heck do black women go for these black guys who are walking along the streets lurching back and forth to keep their pants up

that's the only ones they can catch?

43 posted on 06/18/2011 7:59:52 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"I believe in due time all the facts of the matter will come to light,"

Actually, that was the problem.

(And an unattractive set of facts they were.)

44 posted on 06/18/2011 9:23:32 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

BULL! I’m an ‘old fat man’. I flown hundreds of thousands of mile for 20+ years. That has NEVER EVER happened to me and I’ve never witnessed it. Ever. I call BULL LOUDLY.
Wear your clothes appropriately and stop with the sorry excuses.


45 posted on 06/18/2011 9:44:39 PM PDT by SmartEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I think the problem is the rest of us don’t want to see his azz hanging out of his pants.


46 posted on 06/18/2011 11:03:07 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
If that is the case, then they should not have allowed him on the plane.

Appears the gate agent followed him to the aircraft door, trying to get him to pull his pants up. He just ingored the request and got on. So they threw him off.

From the article:

"When he was asked by our employee at the Jetway to please pull them up, that employee was told to pull them up for him," she said. "And that exchange continued to the door of the plane."

47 posted on 06/18/2011 11:41:47 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SmartEnough
Hmm, the excuse is as long as you are a paying passenger there appears to be NO dress code on USAirways.

And just because you've never seen something that doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

48 posted on 06/19/2011 2:32:03 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
US Airways website says "......Dress code We require that all passengers traveling on AD75 dress in casual business attire. US Airways gate agents are instructed to enforce this dress code, and passengers who fail to dress appropriately may be denied boarding........"

Wouldn't that mean no jeans, shorts, sweats, halter tops, dirty t-shirts, etc.? How is it that this man, among the hundreds of thousands who dress as I have noted, get pulled off a plane and they don't?

49 posted on 06/19/2011 3:45:31 AM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

They obviously cared or there wouldn’t have been a problem.


50 posted on 06/19/2011 4:27:11 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

The dudes with badges don’t get involved until the airline calls them.


51 posted on 06/19/2011 4:32:23 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Neither have I.


52 posted on 06/19/2011 4:32:58 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’m with Hulka on this one. I’m not Japanese and I’m always looking around at my fellow passengers for signs of trouble, fuses sticking out of shoes, guys trying to light their underwear on fire, etc.


53 posted on 06/19/2011 4:34:57 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: livius

Where I live virtually every black woman over 30 weighs several hundred pounds, wears very tight, totally clownish type clothing with flame tips, blonde cow pies or other fantastic colors and styles in their hair. They carry on conversations that are clearly audible from a hundred yards away.
In short, they are happy with any doofus they can get their hands on.


54 posted on 06/19/2011 4:39:50 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
If he had a "non revenue" ticket ~ which could be issued by a travel agent out of the number of tickets allowed to be charged off as "non revenue" under the agreement between the airlines and the authorized ticket agents ~ then he had to agree to a dress code.

He may not have been aware there was a dress code however. That could occur if "coach" whoever gave him a ticket in his name to go to the funeral and return.

"Coach" whoever would tap his resources in the travel agent racket (who he would know from the team's dealings with travel agents for away games) and get a free or non-revenue ticket.

I think this may very well violate NCAA rules!

Both "coach" whoever and the player may be in some serious trouble ~

55 posted on 06/19/2011 9:43:22 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
If he had a "non revenue" ticket ~ which could be issued by a travel agent out of the number of tickets allowed to be charged off as "non revenue" under the agreement between the airlines and the authorized ticket agents ~ then he had to agree to a dress code.

He may not have been aware there was a dress code however. That could occur if "coach" whoever gave him a ticket in his name to go to the funeral and return.

"Coach" whoever would tap his resources in the travel agent racket (who he would know from the team's dealings with travel agents for away games) and get a free or non-revenue ticket.

I think this may very well violate NCAA rules!

Both "coach" whoever and the player may be in some serious trouble ~

56 posted on 06/19/2011 9:43:32 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
If he had a "non revenue" ticket ~ which could be issued by a travel agent out of the number of tickets allowed to be charged off as "non revenue" under the agreement between the airlines and the authorized ticket agents ~ then he had to agree to a dress code.

He may not have been aware there was a dress code however. That could occur if "coach" whoever gave him a ticket in his name to go to the funeral and return.

"Coach" whoever would tap his resources in the travel agent racket (who he would know from the team's dealings with travel agents for away games) and get a free or non-revenue ticket.

I think this may very well violate NCAA rules!

Both "coach" whoever and the player may be in some serious trouble ~

57 posted on 06/19/2011 9:43:43 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I pay VERY close attentiuon to what is going on. Especially on an aircraft.

I think you “see” those incidents because it is something you want to see. . .not that there is anything wrong with that. . .


58 posted on 06/19/2011 11:47:09 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; SmartEnough

“And just because you’ve never seen something that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. “

Silliest comment this month, possibly this year.


59 posted on 06/19/2011 11:52:56 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

In case of an emergency evacuation this yahoo would have been a liability due to his inability to beat a hasty retreat.

That and the fact that putting your butt in the face of everyone is foul.


60 posted on 06/19/2011 5:48:26 PM PDT by Mountain Bike Vomit Carnage (Don't Tweet your meat!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson