I wonder what the liberal reaction to this will be. They will probably hyperventilate about why the Palins would do this. I can just hear Bill Maher, Letterman, et. al. in their criticism of why they would do that.
BTTT for interesting news development!
Has Weiner trademarked “LudicrousPervert” yet?
If not, he needs to get a move on.
Folks, keep in mind that a trademark (name or not) only applies for the goods or services with which it is actually used as a trademark.
It does mean (cleverly) that Palin can get back any domains that are later registered using her name, for political message purposes.
But the name of a president of the US belongs pretty much in the public domain, and probably could not be trademarked.
Any trademark/copyright type lawyers around?
I guess she won't be running third-party. /s
What about Piper and Todd?