Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rescuing the Real Uncle Tom
NY Times ^ | 06/14/11 | DAVID S. REYNOLDS

Posted on 06/14/2011 12:05:22 PM PDT by Borges

The novelist Harriet Beecher Stowe, born 200 years ago today, was an unlikely fomenter of wars. Diminutive and dreamy-eyed, she was a harried housewife with six children, who suffered from various obscure illnesses worsened by her persistent hypochondria.

And yet, driven by a passionate hatred of slavery, she found time to write “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” which became the most influential novel in American history and a catalyst for radical change both at home and abroad.

Today, of course, the book has a decidedly different reputation, thanks to the popular image of its titular character, Uncle Tom — whose name has become a byword for a spineless sellout, a black man who betrays his race.

And we tend to think of the novel itself as an old-fashioned, rather lachrymose affair that features the deaths of an obsequious enslaved black man and his blond, angelic child-friend, Little Eva.

But this view is egregiously inaccurate: the original Uncle Tom was physically strong and morally courageous, an inspiration for blacks and other oppressed people worldwide. In other words, Uncle Tom was anything but an “Uncle Tom.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: christianity; literature; race; slavery; stowe; uncletomscabin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Borges

Kind of like the way liberals have made “swiftboating” a synonym for “lying” when it’s the exact opposite.


21 posted on 06/14/2011 12:51:30 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Well, it was left-wing blacks recruiting for armed struggle (e.g. Malcolm X in his separatist NOI phase) --- not whites --- who turned "Uncle Tom" into a term of contempt. They have no use for a black man who, because of his innate moral strength and dignity, is not motivated by rage, envy, or revenge.

On a related note, I personally suspect that the same passel of liberal literary prudes who want to ban Huckleberry Finn (accordiing to the American Library Association, the most-frequently-complained-about library book in America) --- have not read that, either.

22 posted on 06/14/2011 12:53:31 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (God has set a limit on man's intelligence, but none on his stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot

Austen’s prose is pristine and perfect. How is it not well written?


23 posted on 06/14/2011 12:58:17 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
Absolutely.

In the book we was the embodiment of Christian behavior and love, a man of decency and honor, and to have the race-baiting hucksters co-op his good mane and reputation is a great tragedy.

24 posted on 06/14/2011 1:07:23 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

“Hypochondria is not faking ailments, that is another disorder. It is the persistent concern about being ill or compulsive attention to symptoms.”

Ok, but I still don’t think they should accuse her of it. It seems low.


25 posted on 06/14/2011 1:11:03 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I’ve read UTC. While it has long segments of antiquated prose, sometimes painfully so, it also has passages of great dramatic power.

Interesting factoid. UTC has been in continuous print since written.

You can read or search it online.

http://www.online-literature.com/stowe/uncletom/

Uncle Tom himself is a wholly admirable character. Those who denigrate him are idiots, and are often the same people who glorify the gangbangers.


26 posted on 06/14/2011 1:21:48 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

I presume it comes from the accepting scholarship on her - not something this column is introducing.


27 posted on 06/14/2011 1:54:32 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Mr. Prince of Space’s aunt did some genealogy on their family and found they were related to HBS...as well as Warren Gamaliel Harding, lol.

Mrs. Prince of Space


28 posted on 06/14/2011 3:25:04 PM PDT by Prince of Space ("The problem with quotes on the internet is it's hard to verify their authenticity." Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
It was fairly common among Victorian ladies of a certain class, and yeah, it's pretty well documented.

Her daddy was Lyman Beecher, a hellfire and brimstone Presbyterian preacher, and her mama died when she was only 5. The whole family was roiled with religious controversy -- her older sister went through agonies when her fiance was drowned at sea, believing him to be in Hell. Her brother, Henry Ward Beecher, was accused of adultery with a parishioner and the public trial was a huge scandal. It was enough to drive you to drink . . . or, in her case, to recline on the sofa and have sinking spells and go to warm climates 'for her health'. I can't say I blame her one bit.

By the way, she was a beauty when she was younger -


29 posted on 06/14/2011 3:35:31 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
Jane Austen? Come, come, now. If you're going to make a statement like that, you have to back it up.

When three such dissimilar writers as Nathaniel Hawthorne, Henry James and Rudyard Kipling agree that Austen was a master, you're going to have to be very persuasive.

Fire away.

30 posted on 06/14/2011 3:39:09 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

I don’t have a good case. Seems my name might be fitting in this case. I just always found her to be too predictable - it was easy to figure out who would end up with whom.


31 posted on 06/14/2011 7:56:07 PM PDT by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
Austen was the first person to treat marriage as something more than a sentimental climax. She dealt with it as a complex social and moral negotiation that reveals human character. She was also one of the greatest satirists to ever write in English.
32 posted on 06/14/2011 8:18:44 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
A fair observation, and quite true.

But you can usually see it coming in real life. What Austen is writing about is not who gets whom but how they get there. From one of KIpling's characters, who made the same observation:

‘I mean that ’er characters was no use! They was only just like people you run across any day. . . . an’ some’ow Jane put it down all so naked it made you ashamed'

33 posted on 06/15/2011 3:38:49 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson