Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother

I don’t have a good case. Seems my name might be fitting in this case. I just always found her to be too predictable - it was easy to figure out who would end up with whom.


31 posted on 06/14/2011 7:56:07 PM PDT by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: youngidiot
Austen was the first person to treat marriage as something more than a sentimental climax. She dealt with it as a complex social and moral negotiation that reveals human character. She was also one of the greatest satirists to ever write in English.
32 posted on 06/14/2011 8:18:44 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot
A fair observation, and quite true.

But you can usually see it coming in real life. What Austen is writing about is not who gets whom but how they get there. From one of KIpling's characters, who made the same observation:

‘I mean that ’er characters was no use! They was only just like people you run across any day. . . . an’ some’ow Jane put it down all so naked it made you ashamed'

33 posted on 06/15/2011 3:38:49 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson