"Do you understand what I’m saying? Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on."
Excerpt includes videowith translation.
He has little patience for those whose proclivities tend toward nurturing and cultivating ( of the flocks). He scorns nurturing considering it evidence of weakness.(homophobia) He is not inclined towards cultivating crops or shepherding as his brother Jacob. He prefers to hunt and to get his food by taking it down as hunters do. Esau may well be the stereotypical hustler, predator and “bad guy”. Esau is forever at war among himself.
Arabs cant live together, ergo any prophesied Third Caliphate is likely doomed. Unless a new Saladin arises like Imam Hussein, there will be no Caliphate
This is nothing new. All civilizations till recently waged aggressive war on their enemies and made war pay, at least for the victorious leaders. Captives were just another form of loot, often the most valuable one.
Julius Caesar personally sold something like 2M Gauls into slavery over the course of his 10 year conquest. Which made him far and away the wealthiest man in Rome.
This continued during the Middle Ages, when ransoms of wealthy captives, usually nobles, were traded like stocks. Since you could no longer sell a non-rich captive as a slave, they were generally just killed.
During the wars in the Med between Venice, Spain and the Turks, both sides sold captives as slaves or used them to row their galleys.
The odd thing about the guy here is not his explanation of history, which is quite accurate, it’s his apparent belief that this is still proper, or should be. Most of the rest of the world has moved beyond this, for all its other problems.
Of course if you believe sharia is the proper code of behavior, you’re pretty much stuck with this POV. Otherwise you’re forced to say Mo and the boys were wrong for all those centuries.
I wonder how they would feel about Christians or Jews making sex slaves of their wives / daughters after they were killed in a battle. Would they consider it allowed under the laws of Islam or would they think that was some type of atrocity? It would be an interesting exercise to see if that would be considered acceptable.
There is nothing - NOTHING - that justifies letting this band of nose-picking, crotch-grabbing homicidal savages known as Muslims have any part in the modern world.
How did we end up becoming virtually subject to them? I lived the first decades of my life in the US virtually never hearing about them, and now suddenly we care what they think and we are bowing before their brutish, violent stupidity.
It's just some guy who speaks at the Mosque, or who does law cases.
It's like running an independent church with a janitor as the head guy.
Most of the IGNANCE is generated by people who really are IGNANT.
These people aren't just barbaric, they're not really in touch.
In most of the world you wouldn't go to the local auto mechanic for spiritual advice ~ but in Egypt you'd be lucky to find a guy who was that educated.
I gather from the discussions this fellow needs a date bad.
It's just some guy who speaks at the Mosque, or who does law cases.
It's like running an independent church with a janitor as the head guy.
Most of the IGNANCE is generated by people who really are IGNANT.
These people aren't just barbaric, they're not really in touch.
In most of the world you wouldn't go to the local auto mechanic for spiritual advice ~ but in Egypt you'd be lucky to find a guy who was that educated.
I gather from the discussions this fellow needs a date bad.
I love that his “clarification” indicates that he still strongly believes in slavery, as long as it’s for infidels.