Posted on 06/08/2011 2:33:19 PM PDT by Yaelle
Their marriage has become the subject of intense speculation and scrutiny amid an embarrassing online sex scandal.
Now, Representative Anthony D. Weiner and Huma Abedin are about to make news of a different kind: they are expecting their first child.
Mr. Abedin, 35, is in the early stages of pregnancy, according to three people with knowledge of the situation.
The pregnancy, which the couple has disclosed to close friends and family, adds a new dimension to questions about the future of their marriage.
(Excerpt) Read more at cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com ...
Weiner gets a woman pregnant—is this a dog bites man story or what?!?!
Right. It would be interesting to know how much conjugal time the two have managed since the sham wedding.
Of course, there is always artificial insemination. But then the question would be: “Is it from Wiener’s weiner?
I wonder who she is pregnant BY?
I doubt it but if it is not true with the NYSlimes admit it?
“...garner sympathy ...”
After seeing Elizabeth Edwards pimp her cancer to try and foist her fraud of a husband onto the rest of the country, the words “sympathy” and “democrat” will NEVER appear anywhere near each other in my vocabulary.
The hell with them all. I’m enjoying the meltdown.
Kinda sorta revelling in it, actually.
RE the pic in post #105:
Is it me, or does Weenie the Dork Master perpetually look like he has a broomstick shoved up his keister???
Actually, take a look at most pictures of Libs in general - they ALL have that bug-eyed, glassy, vapid stare. “Crazy Eyes”, I call it.
Doc Savage was right; Liberals ARE mentally deranged.
Inmates running loose.
How convenient. /s
Any confirmation of this story beyond “three people with knowledge of the situation”? Granted, its source now seems an improvement on the first one I saw it attributed to, ‘an anonymous Democrat informant’.
Seriously, I have not heard who was the source for the pregnancy story except “three people in the know.”. You can’t prove or disprove a first trimester pregnancy.
Weiner is still jabbering away, but I haven’t heard him mention this himself. I guess anyone interested has a few months to wait unless they ‘lose the pregnancy’ (and potentially gain more sympathy). Normally I’m not this cynical, but I don’t put much past this guy.
You raise an interesting point. Weiner has NEVER mentioned this “baby.” He could have used this in his press conference to get some sympathy, if not for him, then for Huma.
Maybe he couldn’t mention it then because the Clintons hadn’t come up with that idea yet.
I was out of line, I’m truly sorry about that.
Thanks, hon. That was very nice of you.
I went off the rail. My brain fart. Really, I’m sorry about it all. I was an ass, and thank you for accepting my apology, I appreciate it.
BTW, did you know that 63% ... no, wait, 62.8% of statistics are made up on the spot?
I heard yesterday that Pelosi demanded a through Weiner Probe... or something
Barney Frank volunteered to head the probe!
A couple or three times now I've posted in a certain place "ONLY the rich should ever be taxed". Sadly no one has replied yet. ;-D
With the internet publication of the explicit photo of him in a state of arousal, I predict that coming next election, Anthony Weiner will be facing some STIFF competition!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.