How is someone in New Jersey going to sue someone in Washington state in State Court?
To be a “jornalist” with protection from the State, you must support The Official Reality.
And bloggers, most bloggers, can’t be relied on to do that without supervision.
So should we all start using TOR now to post?
Better to be safe than sorry (when Obama’s thugs raid the servers/confiscate them)
So what kind of implications does that have for FR and Freepers?
The lamestream media sees the first amendment protection of a free press as a “business issue” and has always worked behind the scenes to deprive all others of the license.
To wit: decades ago when townships and communities began posting information on telephone poles and elsewhere regarding pedophiles who had moved into the neighborhood, the lamers did nothing to help citizens fend off lawsuits. No amicus, no nothing.
The lamers are low scum. And I would know because I used to work there.
Hmmm...bloggers, message boards, etc.
Wonder of GBTV will get protections...kind of interesting don’t you think? Moving away from MSM into alternative stuff and wham...you are not protected?
Time for the New Pamphleteers!
Then viciously flaming away when one says: apparently the guy shot made some bad life decisions.
And when shown the error of their one sided argument, you get an idiotic response like: nice try, no cigar.
Come to think of it... ignorant people running their mouths at the expense of other people should be sued. Good luck trying to collect though. It's not likely such stupid people accumulated a lot of money. LoL!
This is setting a dangerous precedent. God help us.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom ofspeechnews media, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
There, I fixed it.
(We don't need no skeenkin' constitutional amendment process)