Posted on 06/05/2011 7:52:15 PM PDT by Kevmo
Dam
whut part of da country is you frum?
What?
The artilc reads better at the source.
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v314.php
The Cold Fusion Ping List
I like the books with tha pictures in em
So this report tends to support Rossi and his LENR?
Something like this.
Sounds good. To where do I send the check?
You should be pants’d for posting this... and made to go through a TSA screening... and forced to watch an episode of “Keeping Up With The Kardashians.”
I always wondered what became of John Holmes’s wang.
Far less complicated than a light water nuclear reactor, coal-fired power plant, automobile engine, personal computer, or cell phone.
We’ll all know for certain this fall. Either it works, or Rossi becomes the new Camping.
Do a test? OK, set up 5 1000 W light bulbs and keep them lit for a week. A reasonable test of a 5 KW power source.
The OP format is hard to read, and does not really prove a point.
So this report tends to support Rossi and his LENR?
***It looks like 40%/60%. 40% chance it’s a real
breakthrough of some sort, 60% chance of fraud. As each fake possibility is knocked off, the chances of it being real grow higher.
One thing that comes to mind is the idiot scientists Targ & Puthoff at SRI who were testing psychics. They were good scientists but they lacked the skillset of a good magician and they were completely fooled. We need investigators who are skilled at fraud to be looking at this, alongside any overly trusting scientists.
Rossi probably isn’t going to make the Autumn deadline, so the situation will be murky for some time.
I am very hopeful that the E-Cat turns out to be all that the inventor has claimed that it is, but I don't have the technical background to read and digest everything you posted.
One thing from the write-up that does trouble me, is the statement that all fakes could not be ruled out. Until a test is performed, in which the observers testify (and document) that NO evidence of trickery or fakery could be found, we're still sort of in a grey area with this.
No need to post someone’s entire web site as a thread. Links will do just fine.
Yeah but if it’s 39% H202 feeding into a Nickel catalyst and some other trickery, it could light those bulbs.
I’ve been on FR long enough to know that those links will go dry. But I haven’t picked up HTML well enough in all these years. The information is valuable and needs to be preserved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.