Only AP Article on Palin Fox News Sunday Interview: Palin: I didn't mess up Paul Revere history

The Associated Press ^ | Sunday, June 5, 2011 | Laurie Kellman

[kristinn]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sarah Palin says she didn't mess up her history on Paul Revere.

[Marty62]

Yes that is what I understood from his summary.

Even with a gun to his head. Makes you wonder what would have happened if he hadn’t been riding and warning everyone along the way. Interesting how they all responded with their guns ready to defend their homes.

Do you know if the threat the Brit made that he had 500 men coming was true.

[HMS Surprise]

Your first statement, that Palin is using the word British as Longfellow did, assumes much, and is dead wrong.

[miss marmelstein]

You gave me a good laugh! So true!

[TigersEye]

"Ringing those bells"? "Warning shots" during the ride through town? (Ever try to reload a muzzleloader on a galloping horse?)

Ever hear of a "figure of speech?" (I'm sure that's beyond your education level.)

[TigersEye]

We can safely assume that the British used "enhanced interrogation methods" before Paul Revere spilled the beans ...

So, you're free to make wild assumptions but Sarah Palin must speak using only dry literal facts even when ambushed by a reporter when she is obviously dead tired? LOL

[Polybius]

The RINO PDS trolls are out this morning I see. These puzzies trash Palin yet won’t say who they support.

Bill Clinton did not announce his first winning candidacy until the October of the year before the general election. The GOP candidate that can ultimately defeat Obama may not even be on the radar screen yet.

In the meantime, it is not Rocket Science to declare who we do NOT support ....... ANY candidate that a crushing majority of American voters have already said that they will DEFINITELY NOT ..... repeat ..... DEFINITELY NOT vote for:

What percentage of ALL voters have stated that they will DEFINITELY NOT ..... repeat ..... DEFINITELY NOT vote for Sarah Palin?

SIXTY FIVE PERCENT (65%).

Such a candidate absolutely GUARANTEES the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama in 2012. America cannot afford such a disaster.

Must be nice to play offense without having to worry about D. At least we criticize Romney while saying we support Palin.

Again .... Bill Clinton did not announce his first winning candidacy until the October of the year before the general election. The GOP candidate that can ultimately defeat Obama may not even be on the radar screen yet.

It is not a matter of supporting RINO Romney. A guaranteed landslide for Barack Hussein Obama (a Sarah Palin nomination) or RINO Romney is a false choice.

Most Americans want "None of the Above" and we are waiting for that candidate to show up before October 2011.

It is a matter of finding a conservative candidate that has not already alienated SIXTY FIVE PERCENT (65%) of all American voters to the point that they have stated that they will DEFINITELY NOT ..... repeat ..... DEFINITELY NOT vote for Sarah Palin in the general election.

At least we criticize Romney while saying we support Palin. Wimps, all of them.

So, you are just going to sit there, like a bump on a log, and complain that the only possible choices are a RINO or a Sarah Palin nomination that absolutely GUARANTEES the reelection of Marxist Barack Hussein Obama?

That does not have anything to do with the lack of wimpiness.

That has everything to do with the total lack of rational thinking.

[Polybius]

The RINO PDS trolls are out this morning I see. These puzzies trash Palin yet won’t say who they support.

Bill Clinton did not announce his first winning candidacy until the October of the year before the general election. The GOP candidate that can ultimately defeat Obama may not even be on the radar screen yet.

In the meantime, it is not Rocket Science to declare who we do NOT support ....... ANY candidate that a crushing majority of American voters have already said that they will DEFINITELY NOT ..... repeat ..... DEFINITELY NOT vote for:

What percentage of ALL voters have stated that they will DEFINITELY NOT ..... repeat ..... DEFINITELY NOT vote for Sarah Palin?

SIXTY FIVE PERCENT (65%).

Such a candidate absolutely GUARANTEES the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama in 2012. America cannot afford such a disaster.

Must be nice to play offense without having to worry about D. At least we criticize Romney while saying we support Palin.

Again .... Bill Clinton did not announce his first winning candidacy until the October of the year before the general election. The GOP candidate that can ultimately defeat Obama may not even be on the radar screen yet.

It is not a matter of supporting RINO Romney. A guaranteed landslide for Barack Hussein Obama (a Sarah Palin nomination) or RINO Romney is a false choice.

Most Americans want "None of the Above" and we are waiting for that candidate to show up before October 2011.

It is a matter of finding a conservative candidate that has not already alienated SIXTY FIVE PERCENT (65%) of all American voters to the point that they have stated that they will DEFINITELY NOT ..... repeat ..... DEFINITELY NOT vote for Sarah Palin in the general election.

At least we criticize Romney while saying we support Palin. Wimps, all of them.

So, you are just going to sit there, like a bump on a log, and complain that the only possible choices are a RINO or a Sarah Palin nomination that absolutely GUARANTEES the reelection of Marxist Barack Hussein Obama?

That does not have anything to do with the lack of wimpiness.

That has everything to do with the total lack of rational thinking.

[Rennes Templar]

“John and Mary are sitting at their dining table...”

One says: “well, our economy is in bad shape and our personal situation is worse than it’s ever been. I think we should vote Obama out.”

The other says: “yes, but what about how Palin got it wrong about Paul Revere? And, I can’t stand her voice. I guess I have no choice but to vote for Obama again”.

John and Mary shouldn’t be married lol

[TigersEye]

Typical troll behavior can be identified by ...

• Liberal use of red herrings.
• Liberal use of straw man arguments.
• Spamming of cut&pasted materials.
• Deliberate factual distortions.
• Deliberately ignoring facts.

[Katya]

what I’m experiencing is fairly common reaction to certain female vocal tones and pitches... will that hurt Sarah? Who knows... I mean, I never thought Obama would be elected.
And no sorry, I’ve managed to avoid hearing Obama speak but a handful of times... his adopted language style and local color is too affected for me. And by “affected” I mean FAKE.

[Peter Libra]

Mail for you.

[mickey finn]

“Well that just seals it. Palinite Freepers have decided that 4/18/1775 was nothing but a gun grab, and the men came out to fight were secondary.”

The Red Coats were not going to Concord to throw the Colonists a clam bake. They were going there to seize their munitions.

PDS has rotted you're brain.

[Calif Conservative]

Bottom line: This is embarrassing for Gov. Palin.

You can spin it all you wish that Palin was technically correct.

But my understanding is the *primary* purpose of Revere’s mission was to warn Americans of the advance of the British.

This will add fuel to the meme that Palin isn’t ready for prime time.

Hope she can recover from this or that DeMint jumps in.

[Calif Conservative]

Palin supporters will have to do better than “well, Obama screwed up *his* history and geography answers too !”

[freespirited]

lol...I haven't heard that one!...do u have a source?

Sure. You'll love this youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjaoJuAYnaI&feature=player_embedded

Then check out this FR thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2198485/posts

[miss marmelstein]

Why are you writing me about Palin being technically correct? I didn’t even hear the sound bite. I don’t care what she said about Paul Revere. I think she’s great; I’ll vote for her if she runs and if she don’t...well, life goes on.

But who do you folks (who don’t like Palin) want to get the nomination? I’m curious about that.

[miss marmelstein]

Oh, DeMint. Well, as Kate Hepburn used to say: bore, bore, bore.

[stayathomemom]

Bookmark for later!

[worst-case scenario]

You’d be surprised how many of the rest of us are embarrassed for the Palin-worshippers.

[miss marmelstein]

Just out of curiosity - who are you supporting?