Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilovesarah2012

That law will be voided with the first lawsuit. If not State, then the Federal court will most likely strike it down.

States cannot even require welfare recipients to apply for work, so how can they insist on running recipients’ personal lives?

Nanny statism.

The law looked good on paper, but no matter how well meaning, it infringes on a person’s personal life.


9 posted on 06/01/2011 6:16:06 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy

That sounds like a freshman college girl I was talking to a long time ago -

“Yes, my parents HAVE to pay for my college, and NO, they can’t tell me what to do.”


11 posted on 06/01/2011 6:18:53 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

Correct...the USSC ruled you cant even drug test legislators, it violates their 4th amendment rights...

and the federal courts have thrown out drug testing for welfare in michigan when it was tried...

Nope....the only people who have to pee in a cup to keep a job are the useful proles who actually work for a living and pay taxes...


12 posted on 06/01/2011 6:24:51 AM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson