Skip to comments.
Navy Names Next Aircraft Carrier USS John F. Kennedy (CVN-79)
U.S. Department of Defense ^
| 5/29/2011
| Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
Posted on 05/29/2011 5:36:19 PM PDT by Tatze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: buccaneer81
Midway, Coral Sea, Yankee Station.
61
posted on
05/29/2011 6:56:04 PM PDT
by
magslinger
(What Would Stephen Decatur Do?)
To: buccaneer81
The USS Hober Mallow?
1/2 joke — there should be something named after Asimov.
62
posted on
05/29/2011 6:56:45 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012)
To: freedumb2003
Both names are available. Franklin was a WWII carrier, and Thomas Jefferson was a submarine decommissioned in 1985.
To: Oztrich Boy
Those village idiots over there really ARE f'n STOOPIT!!!
64
posted on
05/29/2011 6:57:39 PM PDT
by
NWFLConservative
(Game On.......Fight Like a Girl!!...............Saracuda in 2012)
To: magslinger
To: freedumb2003
I wouldn't mind seeing some names from the shuttle program...Challenger, Endeavour and Columbia are naturals.
To: buccaneer81
>>Franklin was a WWII carrier, and Thomas Jefferson was a submarine decommissioned in 1985.<<
Then why is there even a discussion? Especially since there has already been a Kennedy — and named after him a scant year after his passing, no less?
67
posted on
05/29/2011 7:05:52 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012)
To: Tatze; TigersEye
JFK ? NAw, Theyc ould have called it the USS Marilyn Monroe , since Jack had weighed her anchor.
Or maybe the USS Monica Lewinski, instead of the USS Clinton.
Either would be appropriate IMHO.Both women suffered horribly because of them.
68
posted on
05/29/2011 7:06:36 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: Tatze
Interesting. The Pentagon and congress underfunded the Navy from 1989 - present causing the first JFK CV 67 an early end. The only sense I can make out of this is that the first JFK's over all hull condition may not be fit for museum status???
69
posted on
05/29/2011 7:07:38 PM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
To: rbg81
Correct me if I am wrong, but do we not already have a carrier named after JFK in the U.S. Fleet?
To: Tatze
They seem to name everything after politicians now. It must be like living in Stalin’s time.
To: Tatze
72
posted on
05/29/2011 7:14:46 PM PDT
by
Brandonmark
(News Coverage)
To: Tatze
That looks like CVN-OBAMA
To: Tatze
I would like to see a new Yorktown even though I served on the first Big John.
74
posted on
05/29/2011 7:16:33 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: garjog
To: Tatze
The selection John F. Kennedy, designated CVN 79, honors the 35th President of the United States and
pays tribute to his service in the Navy, in the government, and to the nation.
What? He lost the only ship he ever commanded and failed in his attempt to free Cuba from a Communist takeover. The USS Benedict Arnold would be less offensive. IMHO
76
posted on
05/29/2011 7:21:37 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Ronin
My sentiment exactly - he went through a severe ordeal between the time his boat was rammed and the time he was eventually rescued. That was honorable - not in my opinion heroic. He was doing his duty as countless others have.
I applaud his service. There are enough things named after him at this point IMHO. Surely there is another deserving person to name this ship for. Better still - name it the Enterprise or one of the other classic names used by the Navy.
If we have to name it after a person, how about one of our early Naval heroes like John Barry?
Lamh Foistenach Abu!
77
posted on
05/29/2011 7:22:04 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN '69 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: freedumb2003
“My earlier joke notwithstanding how about a new USS Constitution?”
That one is sunk!
78
posted on
05/29/2011 7:27:01 PM PDT
by
mewykwistmas
(Lost your job as a birther under Obama? Become a 'deather'! Where's Bin Laden's death certificate?)
To: null and void
Wow THAT is impressive.
Kennedy deserves a Carrier. He did after all stop the Soviet Missles from being installed in Cuba. I mean he had a lot of personal problems but I don’t think we can be too hard on his Presidencial performance. And ofcourse the biggie. He was ASSASINATED after all. That should count for SOMETHING.
79
posted on
05/29/2011 7:29:09 PM PDT
by
Marty62
(Marty60)
To: NWFLConservative; Tatze
>>> It breaks my heart to think that our country’s namesake, USS America (CV-66) was towed out to sea and used for Tomahawk practice.
That’s not precisely the way it went. USS America wasn’t expended simply as a convenient target. She was tested to destruction.
As part of the design process for the new carrier class, the Navy took the wornout carrier and put her design to the ultimate test. For several days the true strengths and weaknesses of modern American supercarrier design was tested as demolition crews set off monitored charges to explore what her actual limits were. The results to be applied to strengthen the Ford design.
80
posted on
05/29/2011 7:30:49 PM PDT
by
tlb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson