Perry worse than Pawlenty? You’ve got to be kidding.
Pawlenty:
He increased state spending by nearly 40 percent during his eight years in the Governors Office.
He went along with the Democrats to increase property taxes by 12 percent over three years.
He claimed he wanted a state constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. After elected, he never brought the marriage amendment up.
He claims to support Second Amendment rights but has proposed no state constitutional amendment to guarantee the right to keep and bear arms.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2726400/posts
That's pretty much Perry's electoral history. He's proven to be "electable" in a safely Republican state against Scott McClellan's mommy "Grandma Strayhorn", a liberal country music singer; a 9/11 truther, the mayor of Houston, etc.
Any reasonable Republican can see Pawlenty was elected Governor under far tougher circumstances.
From a governing standpoint, it's pretty much a wash. Both Perry and Pawlenty have an acceptable conservative platform and didn't do anything too bad but their records are meh. You're bashing Pawlenty for promising conservatives some red meat and then forgetting about it after he re-elected? Seriously? Perry's famous for doing that, it's known throughout the country that Rick "Texas should secede, yeeehawww!" Perry always say stuff to fire up tea party rallies that he never pushes for after he's re-elected. His list of past non-conservative positions is certainly equal to Pawlenty: Trans-Texas Corridor, DREAM act, signed tuition for illegals, was against building a border fence, promised Texans "no new taxes" then passed new toll roads and cigarette tax increases, etc.
Actually, the election results pretty much speak for themselves on that. 51% of Texas Republicans renominated Rick Perry for Governor. 89% of Minnesota Republicans renominated Tim Pawlenty for Governor. Gee, I wonder who's more popular with their party's base?
That's pretty much Perry's electoral history. He's proven to be "electable" in a safely Republican state against Scott McClellan's mommy "Grandma Strayhorn", a liberal country music singer; a 9/11 truther, the mayor of Houston, etc.
Any reasonable Republican can see Pawlenty was elected Governor under far tougher circumstances.
From a governing standpoint, it's pretty much a wash. Both Perry and Pawlenty have an acceptable conservative platform and didn't do anything too bad but their records are meh. You're bashing Pawlenty for promising conservatives some red meat and then forgetting about it after he re-elected? Seriously? Perry's famous for doing that, it's known throughout the country that Rick "Texas should secede, yeeehawww!" Perry always say stuff to fire up tea party rallies that he never pushes for after he's re-elected. His list of past non-conservative positions is certainly equal to Pawlenty: Trans-Texas Corridor, DREAM act, signed tuition for illegals, was against building a border fence, promised Texans "no new taxes" then passed new toll roads and cigarette tax increases, etc.
Actually, the election results pretty much speak for themselves on that. 51% of Texas Republicans renominated Rick Perry for Governor. 89% of Minnesota Republicans renominated Tim Pawlenty for Governor. Gee, I wonder who's more popular with their party's base?