[wideawake]

Nice rant, but it doesn't excuse the execution of an unarmed, unconscious individual.

That's a complete abandonment of any claim to the moral high ground.

[A Strict Constructionist]

Your are right this is no different in a SWAT team that lets a man bleed out instead of calling the MEDICS it’s murder.

[MileHi]

Maybe. If a SWAT team did the same thing, it would be a “good shoot” because “cops deserve to go home at night”.

[khnyny]

I notice you always tend to take “the moral high ground”on these types of threads, and yes, I am be facetious.

[Cowgirl of Justice]

Too damn bad. Anyone who participates in a crime with a gun is taking the chance they will be killed. Yes, he was on the ground when he was killed. But there are too many other crimes committed the exact same way but with the unarmed innocents killed. Anyone who puts themselves in a violent situation is at risk and both those criminals knew the risk but did it anyway. Would you feel better if the pharmacist and his staff had been the ones executed? Would you be as horrified? Methinks not.