A whole lot more than mere college kids have debunked the lies put out by the anti-birthers. I would point you to the links by other experts with years of experience in photoshop and computer grahics, but you wouldn’t care so why bother?
In any case you are more than welcome to provide a link to a forensics expert or even a team of experts who have personally examined the ORIGINAL 1961 PAPER documents and verified their accuracy.
Until you do that, all we have is one group of experts calling the other group ‘college kids’ throwing spitwads at one another.
I’ll wait expectantly for your link.
All of the ones I've seen are analyzing the green background certified copy. None of their claims carry over to the original scan. Show me something that isn't a college kid in his dorm room acting like an expert and I'll take a look, but you won't find anything.
Tell me, why does the green background have white artifacts from the text? This is exactly what it looks like when layers are extracted from a scan in an optimized PDF.
Tell me in your own words. I don't want to hear from your googled internet experts. I've dealt with enough of them from when I was barraged with Trutherism. I've seen enough armchair explosive experts who 'proved' that the twin towers were blown up with thermate to know them when I see them.
I want to hear from you. Why are the white marks there instead of a static green background and why do none of the graphical quirks show up on the original scan that I showed you?
In your own words please.