[GunRunner]

I would point you to the links by other experts with years of experience in photoshop and computer grahics, but you wouldn’t care so why bother?

All of the ones I've seen are analyzing the green background certified copy. None of their claims carry over to the original scan. Show me something that isn't a college kid in his dorm room acting like an expert and I'll take a look, but you won't find anything.

Tell me, why does the green background have white artifacts from the text? This is exactly what it looks like when layers are extracted from a scan in an optimized PDF.

Tell me in your own words. I don't want to hear from your googled internet experts. I've dealt with enough of them from when I was barraged with Trutherism. I've seen enough armchair explosive experts who 'proved' that the twin towers were blown up with thermate to know them when I see them.

I want to hear from you. Why are the white marks there instead of a static green background and why do none of the graphical quirks show up on the original scan that I showed you?

In your own words please.

[conservativegramma]

Nope not letting you change the direction of the conversation alinsky style.

I asked you for a link to that team of forensic experts who examined the ORIGINAL 1961 PAPER documents (as opposed to electronic images easily manipulated) declaring them authentic.

So provide the link or stop pinging me.

[conservativegramma]

Nope not letting you change the direction of the conversation alinsky style.

I asked you for a link to that team of forensic experts who examined the ORIGINAL 1961 PAPER documents (as opposed to electronic images easily manipulated) declaring them authentic.

So provide the link or stop pinging me.

[Brown Deer]

Try again. The bluish white document was scanned from the white house document with the green background.

[Brown Deer]

Try again. The bluish white document was scanned from the white house document with the green background.