Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: Strauss-Kahn Told Maid 'Don’t You Know Who I Am?' During Alleged Sex Attack
Foxnews ^ | 23 May 2011 | Jana Winter

Posted on 05/23/2011 6:27:02 PM PDT by for-q-clinton

According to the maid’s account, as told to investigators and relayed to FoxNews.com, the maid entered the room and was confronted by a naked Strauss-Kahn, who emerged from the bathroom and began grabbing the maid’s breasts while trying to pin her down on his bed.

The maid is deeply religious, investigators said, and immediately put her hands over her eyes so she wouldn’t see the naked Frenchman. He ran to her, began grabbing her breasts and pulling her down the hallway inside the luxury suite toward the bedroom.

The maid said she tried a variety of tactics to get herself out of the room and away from Strauss-Kahn. She said, “my manager is in the hallway,” which he wasn’t -- but the former IMF chief wasn’t scared off. The single mother allegedly told the Frenchman that the job was important to her and any conflict with a hotel guest would result in her losing her job.

“Please stop. I need my job, I can’t lose my job..." she told Strauss-Kahn, according to law enforcement sources.

Strauss-Kahn allegedly responded: “No, baby. Don’t worry, you’re not going to lose your job..." Strauss-Kahn responded, according to investigators.

While she continued to plead with him, begging him to stop, he allegedly continued to attack her, dragging her down the hallway.

When she pushed him away and ran toward the door, she slipped on a newspaper bag on the floor and fell to her knees. That’s when Strauss-Kahn came up behind her and forced her to perform oral sex, sources said.

The maid finally escaped from her alleged attacker by pushing him into the sharp edge of an armoire in the hotel suite. Sources said the Frenchman has a gash on his back where he hit the armoire.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doyouknowwhoiam; dsk; imf; moralabsolutes; rape; rulingclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-272 next last
To: DesertRhino

I also hear they like to have sex in Africa too. What’s your point? Are you suggesting by coming to America she stopped liking sex?


161 posted on 05/23/2011 8:50:58 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

What is unheard of is .......husbands.


162 posted on 05/23/2011 8:51:31 PM PDT by Carley (OBAMA, DO YOU HEAR ME NOW........... '67 BORDERS, IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

So how many of the woman that refused sex did he rape? Apparently 0 therefore your argument is moot. Now if you are saying he tried to rape them and they got away...then you have a point. If so, please send me a link to the article.


163 posted on 05/23/2011 8:53:25 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Don’t waste your time. This guy was on a similar thread the other night getting really explicit to the point of gross. I see he’s cleaned it up just enough tonight so he won’t get run off. I’m guessing a guy with really bad luck with women. DSK wannabe.


164 posted on 05/23/2011 8:55:13 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BufordP

This is a line commonly used by arrogant (bleep)s in high positions to justify their bad behavior. I have even heard it from a Fortune 500 executive as part of his intimidation act after committing vehicular assault. Such arrogant (bleep)s also tend to be limousine liberals.


165 posted on 05/23/2011 8:55:51 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I know...this was an HIV muslim we let in! WTF are we thinking.

Hmmmm...I think I have more of a problem letting in Soro's buddy that is a card carrying socialist with an insatiable sexual appetite (your words). Sounds like most members of the UN to me. I have more sympathy for the muslim widow woman with children and HIV in this case. I'm tired of globalist bullies ruining America. But if that's who you prefer, it says a lot about you.

166 posted on 05/23/2011 8:57:23 PM PDT by mplsconservative (Impeach Obama Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Even if she said her life was threatened, you’d discount that down to nothing, too.

There’s really no justification for your position on this. We all know he is innocent until proven guilty, but we are weighing the facts that he’s stated, her facts, the police’s, and the former hired hookers. The rest of us say, “This looks terrible for him,” while you say, “Guys, in all likelihood, she’s made this whole thing up!”

Really, you are in a completely indefensible position under the circumstances.


167 posted on 05/23/2011 8:57:36 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

I see you’re back again lacking the ability to read for comprhension. You were reading WAY too much into what I was posting before—pretty sad in fact.


168 posted on 05/23/2011 8:57:42 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Even if she said her life was threatened, you’d discount that down to nothing, too.

Wait a second. So she didn't say he threatened her life. So all those posts about her life being threatened are based on nothing but imagination. The fact that it wasn't reported speaks volumes. Which means it easily could have started off consentual but she didn't want to lose her job and then get deported so she claimed rape after it got too rough for her.

So to recap your point is she was in fear for her life so she didn't bite it off. Yet she chose to wrestle and fight with the larger man. And even though she never said he threatened her and she did say she was only worried about her job still means she was threatened. But I'm wrong because if it was said (which it wasn't) I'd presumably dismiss it as if it never happened. Well so far it hasn't happened, yet you are claiming it did.

169 posted on 05/23/2011 9:01:40 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Batman11
She should have bit his armoire off!

Oui. Completement d'accord. A swift kick to the buffet also works, but I would avoid any sudden moves around his divan, it could knock the bibelots off his etagere, and that really sets the Frogs off.

BTW, is it just moi, but are these forensic sex questions a good idea on the site?

170 posted on 05/23/2011 9:01:59 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (We live in America's "Awkward" Era. Too late to fix the country. To early to start shooting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

“pretty sad in fact.”

Re-read your unhealthy posts from tonight. They all scream I hate women. Seek help.


171 posted on 05/23/2011 9:02:37 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

Wow once again supposed freedom loving people are wanting to put people in jail for political beliefs.

How about we don’t let any of them in our country?


172 posted on 05/23/2011 9:03:55 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Really? Where do I say that. I think they are screaming I don’t believe the cops, or Muslim, HIV infected women wanting to stay in the US, or prosecutors at face value. And they are screaming louder than anything INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.


173 posted on 05/23/2011 9:05:46 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

When a guy leaves blood and semen and lies five different ways while attempting to flee the country on a moment’s notice, it’s really hard for anyone to think that this guy has been “set up.”

There were no prosecutors involved with what happened until long after he started down this road. Your past experience, if it had the same set of overwhelming, self-inflicted issues, before police involvement, would have deserved jail, too. Did you or your friend attempt to flee the country, too?


174 posted on 05/23/2011 9:06:07 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

First this person is from a foreign country. If I was in a foreign country and this happened I may try to catch my flight. Also I heard he was getting on his scheduled flight? Is this not true?

But yes if I had a scheduled flight and someone started claining I raped them...I’d tried to get back home where my country could “protect” me from false claims.

And the lawyer did tell us most people convict themselves (innocent and guilty) by talking about the issue. They always make incorrect statements which are later used against them. That’s why they say NEVER speak to cops. In my case the person didn’t speak to the cops and the cops had him arrested on basically no evidence because it pissed them off that he wouldn’t talk to them. So a bunch of money later we were proven innocent (yes I said innocent) because the judge through it out after the state presented their case. It was clearly BS and it was obvious.

So in my book, unless there is more than circumstantial evidence I’m going to reserve judgement.


175 posted on 05/23/2011 9:13:12 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

You wrote:

“Now explain why she would perform oral on him and not bite it off or scratch him up?”

Simple: ask any victim and she (and in some cases he) will tell you they know they will be horribly beaten for trying to wound a man that way. Usually the forced oral sex only comes after some initial violence where the threat is made plain. Are you honestly telling me that every woman who is orally sodomized is some how just a cowardly weakling? That is the only logical explanation that can work with what you have posted.

“Clearly she was willing to fight, but I guess something was stopping her from fighting with her mouth.”

Again, she was already treated violently, tried to get away and probably thought she was overwhelmed and had better co-operate. As soon as she had a chance, she broke free and ran away. Have you never, ever had to deal with anyone who was sexually abused or attacked?

“She may have marks on her neck that shows he was choking her, but if not...something doesn’t make sense in that scenario.”

Actually, so far, every detail I have heard about this case makes perfect sense. I have yet to hear anything that doesn’t jive with almost every other case of sexual attack I have ever heard of. Go ahead and ask any cop, or detective or prosecutor.


176 posted on 05/23/2011 9:17:08 PM PDT by vladimir998 (When anti-Catholics can't debate they just make stuff up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: kdot

You get it. You understand. I have to admit that I am a bit bewildered at how many Freepers are complete morons when it comes to understanding something as obvious as rape/sexual assault!


177 posted on 05/23/2011 9:18:58 PM PDT by vladimir998 (When anti-Catholics can't debate they just make stuff up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Are you honestly telling me that every woman who is orally sodomized is some how just a cowardly weakling?

Where did I say everyon woman who is orally sodomized is a coward?

This woman appears to only be worried about her job. He doesn't threaten her (at least not that's been reported). She claims she will lose her job and he says she won't. So if that's what she considers a threat on her life then she's too stupid to even clean hotel rooms.

But if she was forced to perform oral sodomy then you'd agree there would be marks on her face, neck, head, and or hair that are consistent with forceful rape, right? And if not then something else happened. Rape may have occurred after the oral sex, but not at that point (at least not without some marks on her head or shoulders). I think we all understand there was no knife or gun present (unless it's just not been reported yet).

178 posted on 05/23/2011 9:24:20 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Actually he is a perfect target for a set-up and he knows it.

Just like Teddy Kennedy, Gary Condit and the former governor of New York, a man who is guilty about one thing many times acts guilty about a lot of things.

I’m not sure he is innocent but I wouldn’t be surprised one way or another.


179 posted on 05/23/2011 9:25:27 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
You say this happened at 3 AM, so ‘she's got to be a hooker’. The link below states this happened at noon on the day he was already supposed to be gone.

You say she didn't report the crime, so ‘she must not have been threatened.” However, the link below states she was nearly inconsolable at first while waiting for the authorities to arrive WITH ADDED FORENSIC EQUIPMENT, which, according to the link below, states it was barely over an hour of the moment of the attack (which I think is pretty quick). The link shows that she didn't even think she had standing to contact authorities for the crime with her position or status (whatever that may mean).

You think she could have been paid to come up to the room, but the link below shows she had been covering that floor for a friend who was on leave.

You think she arranged with Strauss-Kahn for a rendezvous, but, according to the link below, she only entered that floor after a room service employee checked to assure everything was safe and that the occupant was gone. That's not exactly a planned “rendezvous,” is it?

You positions are sick.

For your reading pleasure:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-21/dominique-strauss-kahns-sexual-assault-case-what-happened/full/

By the way, notice how police and prosecutors didn't make the hotel staffers stay silent? There's way too many people involved for an alleged coverup, like what you claim to have experienced.

180 posted on 05/23/2011 9:28:20 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson