To: allmost
Two big drawbacks - engineering for molten-metal-coolant reactors of any kind is a b*tch, and (IIRC) there is no reprocessing.
Neither one is insurmountable, but the other thing is that without the uranium cycle reactors, you cannot make nuclear weapons.
11 posted on
05/22/2011 6:39:55 PM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
I've read the waste turns to fairy dust. You make me cry. :( /s
There are extensive assertions on 'the web' concerning the ease of recapture/reprocessing/disposal. None of them contain specifics. Thank You.
16 posted on
05/22/2011 6:51:17 PM PDT by
allmost
To: Spktyr
Neither one is insurmountable, but the other thing is that without the uranium cycle reactors, you cannot make nuclear weapons. Which explains the TRUE goals of the "no-nuke" movements.
I wrote--but then erased--"Damn all of them to hell" but then remembered that I am supposed to pray for my enemies.
Man are my molars getting worn down!
Cheers!
29 posted on
05/22/2011 8:43:21 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson