Posted on 05/22/2011 9:07:12 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Obama: Controversy over border comments 'not based in substance' By: CNN Wire Staff
(CNN) - President Barack Obama said Sunday that any controversy over his remarks last week that Israel-Palestinian negotiations should start from pre-1967 borders and include land swaps was "not based in substance."
In his first speech as president to the main American-Israeli lobby group, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Obama said his reference to the border issue in a major policy speech on the Middle East "means that the parties themselves - Israelis and Palestinians - will negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967," the eve of the six-day war in which Israel seized the West Bank, Gaza Strip and other territory.
"That's what mutually agreed-upon swaps means. It is a well-known formula to all who have worked on this issue for a generation," Obama said to applause. "It allows the parties themselves to account for the changes that have taken place over the last 44 years," including the new demographic realities on the ground and the needs of both sides.
He later added: "If there is a controversy, then, it's not based in substance."
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...
Back to the old “you’re too stupid to understand the subtlety and nuance of my remarks” crap.
Reminds you of a)stimulus and b)healthcare and just how wrong were we when we objected to those?
Ha haaaaa!!!
That line worked great for Newt.
"YOU'RE not based on substance!"
He is slippery as a bag of slime.
In fact, come to think of it, he is a bag of slime.
Being fluent in Obonics, I can translate this:
"Netanyahu ate my lunch and popped the sack but I can't come out and admit that."
Therein lies the real problem.
Someday, one way or another, Obama will be out of the White House.
But the brain dead, liberal rumpswabs who voted him into office are still out there, breathing, reproducing and voting.
If Israel were to declare war against the U.S. while Obama was still in Office, it would be difficult for me not to support Israel.
Maytag Agitator in spin cycle.
Do you think that just maybe the healthcare bill isn’t based on substance either?
Lib Jews. MSNBC spent the whole day defending the idea of the old borders as wise and good. Whups under the Obamabus with them.
With DoubleSpeak words mean whatever he says they mean. If you write a speach make sure it has enough dubious phrases that you can blame others for misinterpreting it.
Mel
Beeep... beeep... beeep... beeep...
That’s the sound of nobama backing up, better known as flip-flopping.
Complete waste.
He’s right in the sense that the controversy is based in what he said.
entire AIPAC speech:
http://www.c-span.org/Events/Pres-Obama-Impatience-Growing-for-Peace-Deal/10737421659-7/
“1 speech and 3 days of damage control.”
He never knows when to shut up.
They piped in his speech on a bus in Jerusalem today while I was on it. I didn’t care what he said about anything. When he breathes, he lies. When he lies, he breathes. I tried to pay attention, but all I could hear was “blahblahblah lying sack of S##@ blahblahblah”. I do recall him saying “we’ve placed the toughest sanctions on Iran ever,” and “when I said 1967 borders, I meant...” and after that I blanked out.
“And...anything O says is not based in reality...”
Anything O says is not based on ‘substance’. He said it.
His mainstream media acting as a surrogate and clarified the issue, and he doubled down today, suggesting the first ever Palestine have a continuous border between the West Bank and Gaza. What the hell does he think that means?
BiBi Netanyahu and Barry Soetoro in their early twenties
> ( Lucianne.com)
Obama gives an accurate review of himself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.