Skip to comments.
William & Kate’s Baby Heartbreak: Royal Couple May Not Be Able To Conceive!
Hollywood Life ^
| May 18th, 2011
| N/A
Posted on 05/21/2011 8:10:19 PM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: celtic gal
She didn’t undermine anything. Charles turned to her after being driven mad with boredom by Diana.
61
posted on
05/21/2011 9:47:19 PM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: kabumpo
Yeah, while still on his honeymoon.
62
posted on
05/21/2011 9:48:48 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(“You mess with Israel, you mess with the U.S.”-Herman Cain)
To: celtic gal
Yes, if Charles had already died.
63
posted on
05/21/2011 9:48:52 PM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: Politicalmom
That’d how boring she was.
64
posted on
05/21/2011 9:50:06 PM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
True enough. Queen Elizabeth’s own mother outlived her other daughter: Princess Margaret (though not by much).
To: kabumpo
Right. Those “vow” things are really just “suggestions”.
66
posted on
05/21/2011 9:50:57 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(“You mess with Israel, you mess with the U.S.”-Herman Cain)
To: kabumpo
It is an interesting thing too that if the Duke of Windsor and Wallis, had been King and she whatever she would have been called, they had no children and Elizabeth would have become queen in the end anyway. The Duke and Duchess of Windsor outlived the queen’s father...
To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
68
posted on
05/21/2011 9:53:31 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
To: kabumpo
That is not correct. Camilla was in the picture even before the wedding took place and was a key player at Highgrove per the valet to Charles at the time. Diana, you will recall was only 20 and a couple of weeks old when she married this guy 13 years her senior because she had no past unlike Camilla. Charles, like many in the upper class, believe it was just fine to run around on your spouse as long as it was discreet. Only after this had gone on for some time did Diana finally have her own affair, which she should not have done. She was betrayed before the I do was said and signatures were dry on the documents following the wedding. Charles had few kind words for his new wife as she began her public duties. She like Fergie, were given plenty of criticisms and not much in the way of encouragement.
To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
So the B***H has started her malicious gossiping about Williams wife.
70
posted on
05/21/2011 9:57:56 PM PDT
by
Marty62
(Marty60)
To: Politicalmom
Yep how about those C intertwined cuffinks!
To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
“...the throne would defer to the eldest male child of his younger brother Harry.”
Well, we are far in the future here, but, should William die heirless wouldn’t the throne go to Harry himself? Then to his child, if he had one, then to who? I’m hoping for a King Ralph scenario here, but since Queen Elizabeth had 4 children I’m thinking they are pretty well covered heir-wise.
72
posted on
05/21/2011 10:19:36 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: freekitty
Neither do I, simply I don't believe Camilla knows a darn thing about anything, and she would certainly know better than to DIS the Queen, who can't stand her anyway.
She has already caused enough heartache in that family, now just why would she want to generate more for the Queen.
This story is false. Tabloid junk.
To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
I can fix that problem....
74
posted on
05/21/2011 10:29:51 PM PDT
by
Vendome
("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
To: fhayek
“I, for one, am not going to worry about this.”
LOL. Me neither!
To: buccaneer81
No chance. Elizabeth will push herself to 105 before she'll let Charles sit on the throne. She's no dummy, that one.
76
posted on
05/21/2011 10:31:45 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
Camilla Says it all right there doesn't it - the woman who messed up Diana's marriage and is an all around hag. Throw slime at Kate because she probably doesn't approve of her.
77
posted on
05/21/2011 10:39:09 PM PDT
by
Godzilla
(3-7-77)
To: MindBender26
This is complete BS, designed only to get people to go to the site and buy krep advertised on the stupid website Did you say krep? They have actual krep for sale?
I'm heading to the website right now!
78
posted on
05/21/2011 11:13:23 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: kabumpo
Actually, you can take to the bank that Edward III was not the son of Edward II (a flaming lavender queen and a sort of talentless Freddie Mercury) who never consummated his marriage to Isabella, the daughter of French King Philip the Fair. She left England for France, joining the French knight who was the likely father of Edward III, then returned to England to dispatch Edward II by taking him off the throne to a palace outside London where they executed him at length by slicing off body parts until he died. Isabella served as regent for her son until he came of age and ordered his real father executed and her placed under house arrest until she entered a convent. Braveheart covers the perversion of Edward II quite accurately even though it portrays William Wallace as Isabella's lover which is rather unlikely since she was a child when he was murdered by Edward I.
Another who comes immediately to mind is Henry VIII's son who succeeded him. Since the Church law of the time prohibited Henry's divorce from Catherine of Aragon much less his marriage to five others, only his daughter Mary (by Catherine of Aragon) was a legitimate heir. Lizzie I was also a bastard, therefore.
How very unlikely it is that no other bastards ever sat upon the Brit throne??? I do admit sympathizing with my Irosh ancestors over my British ancestors.
I might add that Britain would have profited from having some competent bastard on the throne instead of the likes of George III
79
posted on
05/21/2011 11:39:36 PM PDT
by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
To: buccaneer81
"Harry has been immune so far."![](http://laineygossip.com/pics/kate%20middleton%2028apr11%2006.jpg)
Here his hair looks a little thin in the back of the head. Maybe he's just disheveled.
80
posted on
05/22/2011 12:43:58 AM PDT
by
Mila
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson