And that was BEFORE they started rioting in the streets...
HEY SYRIA!!
Here's some cheese to go with that whine!
The dead won’t be burning any more Christian churches I guess. Over sixty have been torched by the Islamists since this uprising started.
No “no fly zone” for you...
Why would anyone be surprised by this crackdown by Assad? The only thing that seems off to me is that this is taking as long as it is for him to shut this down. He is a brutal thug after all.
Syria gets a pass while Libya gets bombed - hmmmmm?
Mel
What??? Impossible ... according to the Islamists and their sycophants in the press and on the left it is only the Joooos who kill Arabs. </sarcasm>
I once listened to a Muslim try and tell me they were more moral then Americans in his country. So far I can’t figure out what Muslim country he was talking about, I keep scratching countries off the list, it must not of been Syria.
If there's a place in the world where such a thought passes for good sense, I suppose it would have to be among 7th century Islamics.
HF
Yes, because the world always needs more “horrific” pictures thrown in our faces.
And that was BEFORE they started rioting in the streets...
HEY SYRIA!!
Here's some cheese to go with that whine!
...and according to Hillary Assad is a “reformer”.
No wonder Mitchell packed it in.
Who could ever change these barbarians?
Chit! I had to re-read this twice to make sure they weren’t talking about Detroit.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
As long as it’s Muslims killing Muslims, I’m ok with it.
Bashir Assad’s father, Hafez Assad, murdered 20,000 people in the city of Homs. And why not? Nobody’s going to stop it. This administration has its hands full just trying to write a hushed complaint that isn’t too strongly worded.
Paging Hillary. Your favorite dictator’s body count is increasing dramatically.
I was hopeful( I wasn't online in the 90's on the 'net so I think I may have been a minority) and wanted in the 90's after Desert Storm to have soldiers amass on Syria's borders to keep Saddam's weapons from moving there and to keep the Iran>Syria>Hizbollah line stopped, also to protect the Kurds which as is now history were slaughtered by Saddam after the allies( all of them) oddly left. But of course wtf do I know. There was more to it than that; reasons I mean, Syria is a horrific nation.
I just hope now Israel deals that country a blow in which it'll never recover.
Obama will do nothing and declare victory. He's just that pres____ent a loser of a leader.
The European/Obama pronouncements that they have a “right” and even a “right under international law” to bomb Libya are shown to be pure hypocrisy and self-serving convenient props for picking and choosing where they will/must “take action” and where they can’t/won’t.
Am I entirely opposed to ALL the actions in support of the rebels in Libya? NO.
Just don’t tell me “international law” or a vote at the U.N. or any other prop identifies a “right” for that action.
It is neither a “right” nor a wrong.
A nation either finds it in THEIR interest to take such actions, or they don’t. End of story.
The rest of the moral relativist pronouncements about what gives anyone a “right” to justify such actions is pure nonsense.