Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance (Newt praises Romneycare)
NBC Meet the Press via Newsmax ^ | 2011-05-15 | Tim Collie

Posted on 05/15/2011 10:15:58 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Sunday that he strongly supports a federal mandate requiring citizens to buy health insurance – a position that has been rejected by many Republicans, including several who likely will be running against him for the Republican presidential nomination.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Gingrich told host David Gregory that he continues to advocate for a plan he first called for in the early 1990s as a Congressman, which requires every uninsured citizen to purchase or acquire health insurance.

(snip)

Gregory asked Gingrich if he would criticize GOP presidential rival Mitt Romney, whose "Romneycare" health program enacted during his time as Governor in Massachusetts mandated that all uninsured purchase health insurance.

Gingrich replied he would not make it an issue in the campaign and said he agreed with key aspects of Romneycare.

"I agree that all of us have a responsibility to pay--help pay for health care," Gingrich said, adding, "I've said consistently we ought to have some requirement that you either have health insurance or you post a bond ..."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; fung; gingrich; newt; newt4obama; newt4romney; newtgingrich; obamacare; rino; romneycare; stenchofromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: rabscuttle385

Like I said - you are harping on nonsense. Keep it up - like I said ‘your harp’ shows who/what you are. Everyone else knows who Sarah is and what she is about. This is a conservative site - not a dummy site. I remember your antics in ‘08 and now I see a repeat of it.


21 posted on 05/15/2011 10:57:04 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

agreed. I had not idea.


22 posted on 05/15/2011 10:58:43 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Bye Newt you are finished!


23 posted on 05/15/2011 11:02:02 PM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Newt is a very intelligent man but he’s also very mentally undisciplined and unprincipled. He never seems to back-check his logic to see if it holds water and is grounded in facts. A great many of his conclusions are based on flimsy leaps of reasoning.


24 posted on 05/15/2011 11:02:49 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Bye Newt you are finished!


25 posted on 05/15/2011 11:03:45 PM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Bye Newt you are finished!


26 posted on 05/15/2011 11:03:53 PM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Photobucket
27 posted on 05/15/2011 11:14:02 PM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Gingrich has a compulsion to be the be the smartest guy in the room, thus this pathologically self-destructive pose. The best place for him is academia where he can do this without consequences to the nation.


28 posted on 05/15/2011 11:15:06 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Cute photo of a phony. Gingrich, Romney, et al, cannot win in the general election for one simple reason: I will work my ass off to defeat them.


29 posted on 05/15/2011 11:23:52 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Like I said - you are harping on nonsense.

Sure, I'm "harping on nonsense" just like all the folks who were here publicly warning about Bush before conservatives stupidly elected him into office.

The fact of the matter is that Palin willingly traveled to Arizona to campaign for an undisputed RINO. While there, she wrote an op-ed for The Arizona Republic in which she stated that she had admired McCain for years before the 2008 election, even making reference to his fighting conservatives. While there, she publicly declared that she agreed with his position on immigration (which was still in favor of a blanket amnesty) and that McCain was a member of the Tea Party. All of these statements are verifiable in media outlets both liberal and conservative.

To date, she has not repudiated any of her public statements regarding McCain or her agreement with his stance on immigration (amnesty).

Keep it up - like I said ‘your harp’ shows who/what you are.

And that is what, precisely?

If you want to make accusations, then by all means, go for it.

Everyone else knows who Sarah is and what she is about.

One can only speak for himself or herself; pretending to speak out on behalf of "everyone" is rather arrogant, don't you think?

This is a conservative site - not a dummy site.

Then why were the majority of folks here jumping up and down for McCain - even though he's not a conservative - in 2008?

Conservatives need to draw the line and start supporting candidates who consistently adhere to conservative values and who steadfastly advocate for conservative positions, no exceptions.

Unfortunately for the Republican Party, that pretty much rules out about most of their "mainstream" candidates.

30 posted on 05/15/2011 11:24:22 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Exactly what I was thinking.


31 posted on 05/15/2011 11:27:53 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Goodbye Newt and don’t let the door hit you on the way out. The man must have a persecution complex. Why would he even be on FOX anymore?


32 posted on 05/15/2011 11:33:39 PM PDT by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Agree. Weak field. Sad really.


33 posted on 05/15/2011 11:33:57 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Then why were the majority of folks here jumping up and down for McCain - even though he's not a conservative - in 2008?

What a LIE - they were not! Until SARAH came into the picture most of us weren't going to vote. SHE game conservatives some hope.

YOU have a major problem with her and you did all along. Like I said - I remember your tactics in '08 and I'm wise to them.

Conservatives need to draw the line and start supporting candidates who consistently adhere to conservative values and who steadfastly advocate for conservative positions, no exceptions.

That what your mantra in '08. Tell us WHO is the conservative that fits the bill for you in '12?
34 posted on 05/15/2011 11:34:55 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
When you are running on the bottom of the ticket, you cannot buck the Presidential candidate on a majority of issues of you will lose for sure.

Palin has more than proven she is a worthy conservative and has been leading the fight against Obama for the past two years.

You are looking for the perfect candidate who is 100% pure in your eyes. That candidate doesn't exist. Reagan wasn't perfect. Goldwater was far less perfect (in fact he arranged an abortion for his daughter in the days when abortion was illegal).

35 posted on 05/15/2011 11:35:03 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I want Sen DeMint to run!


36 posted on 05/15/2011 11:36:10 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

So Newt Gingrich has joined the legions who believe the United States should opt for a Marxist future and who feel that the constitutional limits on the power of the government are illegitimate.

Too bad; when did that happen?


37 posted on 05/15/2011 11:38:40 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; ...
And Newt moves into the "completely unacceptable" category. He must really be a tone-deaf moron.


38 posted on 05/15/2011 11:49:33 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

I just don’t get the attraction to centrally governing all citizens — it’s a idea that’s completely #’d up. Newt has been on this road for a while, so I’m not surprised he’s waving the Federal health care flag. It’s a shame though, he had a particular Conservative trait that he articulated well. Unfortunately, his appeal towards Socialism trumps his flirtations with Liberty.

He makes Ron Paul look even better.


39 posted on 05/15/2011 11:52:01 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Newt isn’t just toast...but burnt toast.

I don’t get his thinking at all.


40 posted on 05/16/2011 12:23:35 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Age, skill, wisdom, and a little treachery always overcome youth and arrogance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson