[Red_Devil 232]

I wonder if the State is spending less on covering health care have state taxes gone down?

[tsowellfan]

We're in serious trouble is Mitt Romney wins the nomination. I would vote for anybody against Obama but I will have to hold my nose like I did for McCain. Everytime I had to hold my nose to vote for a republican, they normally lose the election.

When we have to hold our nose to vote for a candidate that's a guarantee that many have stayed home and didn't vote at all.

When a nominee is one you have to hold your nose to vote for there is little if no incentive to become an activist for that candidate and go out and “rock the vote” for him.

[KEmom]

I would like RomneyCare repealed, too!!!

Very disappointed that he still thinks RomneyCare is ok, it is NOT!!!

[Bruinator]

“While I have had my disagreements with the Journal’s editorial board, where we find common ground is on the need to repeal ObamaCare and replace it with reforms that empower states to craft their own solutions. A one-size-fits-all plan that raises taxes and ignores the very real differences between states is the wrong course for our nation.”

Any form on universal care, wether state run or fed govt run is evil.

[avacado]

Romney explains his forced health care mandates.

[DaxtonBrown]

Let’s see, start out on the wrong side of the Wall Street Journal editorial board and watch your credibility among conservatives soar. Now that’s a plan.

[Diogenesis]

Milt Romney SOLD his house in Belmont, did he not?

[ExCTCitizen]

To all Mitt haters:

Come on....With a liberal state, the legislators had even a worse bill then the one Mitt signed. Mitt could have done nothing and Mass would even have a WORSE HEALTH CARE law the RomneyCare. He was painted into a corner, so he thought he did a good thing.

I'm not a Romney supporter, but he isn't a LIBERAL. Maybe not a 100% conservative, but better then a 100% Marxist we have now!!

[colorado tanker]

You would think a guy that smart would know the First Rule of Holes. But noooooo . . . .

[9YearLurker]

The guy starts right off by disingenuously quoting nearly a billion spent on the uninsured, whereas the WSJ had already made the case why most of that was for those who couldn’t afford health insurance, not those just not wanting to pay for it.

At least the good news about the establishment ganging up behind Mitch is that Mitt might not nail down the nomination, starting with NH, almost right out of the gate. (Here’s hoping the process is slowed down sufficiently for voters to coalesce around a true conservative this time.)

[ExCTCitizen]

Mitt, you did what you thought you could. I am not supporting you, but you still are better than 0.

If you do get the nomination, I'll support you.

[rhema]