Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon's Light Attack Plane Competition Has Large Implications
Lexington Institute ^ | May 11, 2011

Posted on 05/12/2011 6:04:24 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Pentagon's Light Attack Plane Competition Has Large Implications

(Source: Lexington Institute; issued May 11, 2011)

(© Lexington Institute; reproduced by permission)

The Air Force is planning to buy a "light attack and armed reconnaissance" aircraft for use by U.S. and foreign pilots in counter-insurgency warfare. At about $10 million per plane, it's probably the cheapest combat aircraft the service will buy in this century -- which is one reason why few politicians or pundits are paying attention.

But the competition to select a winning aircraft raises broader questions about the way the military buys weapons, and in particular whether Pentagon policymakers grasp the seriousness of America's recent economic slide.

There are only two credible contenders for the contract: an American plane made by Hawker Beechcraft designated the AT-6, and a Brazilian plane made by Embraer designated the EMB-314. They're both propeller driven, multi-mission aircraft, and their price-tags are similar. But because the Beechcraft offering would be developed and assembled in America, it would generate over 1,000 jobs here. The Brazilian plane would be developed elsewhere, and final assembly in the U.S. would probably generate less than a hundred jobs.

So here's the obvious question: why would the military of a country running the biggest budget and trade deficits in history consider buying a new light fighter from a foreign maker when there's a perfectly good plane already available from domestic sources?

We know the American offering works fine, because the same airframe has been used by the Air Force and Navy for training pilots over the past ten years, and hundreds of them are operated out of six domestic locations. That probably makes the American plane the most cost-effective entrant in the competition, since there is already a training and maintenance infrastructure in place and pilots understand the plane well.

But the fact the Air Force is even entertaining a bid from Brazil tells us that this Pentagon is out of touch with economic realities. Let's set aside the fact Brazil's government often disagrees with U.S. defense policies in places like Iran and Venezuela, and try to ignore the provision in Embraer's bylaws allowing that government to cut off the flow of spare parts and supplies if it doesn't like the way the plane is being used somewhere.

Instead, consider what has happened to America's economy over the last ten years. On the morning of 9-11, the United States was generating 32 percent of all global economic output. Today it has fallen to 23 percent, and if Congress refuses to raise the debt limit it would decline even further to 20 percent of global output, because federal borrowing currently exceeds 10 percent of gross domestic product.

Is this the profile of a country that can afford to pass up a thousand new jobs and buy overseas just because some state-influenced foreign company might offer it a marginally better deal on a military turboprop? I don't think so! The U.S. Air Force needs to start thinking more clearly about its responsibilities to taxpayers during a period of great fiscal and economic danger. Maybe that means cutting the amount of money we spend on fighting other countries' wars.

At the very least, though, it means buying American-made aircraft whenever a suitable product is available to meet military needs. That's what China does -- it buys from Chinese sources whenever possible -- and right now it's rising about as fast as America is receding. Whatever kind of "deal" the Air Force thinks it might be able to get from Brazil, it's a net loss for America if we don't buy the U.S. plane.

-ends-


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; embraeremb314; hawkerbeechcraft; pentagon; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2011 6:04:30 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Obvious question: with UAVs, why do we need this plane...other than to put pilots at risk?


2 posted on 05/12/2011 6:10:51 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Obama will fix this to be awarded to Brazil, especially if Beechcraft plans to assemble them in South Carolina.


3 posted on 05/12/2011 6:11:07 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
when there's a perfectly good plane already available from domestic sources?

BULL SH*T! The domestic plane is still in development. The Super Tocano is a combat proven design actually in service with foreign air forces.

I want our guys to have the best available for the best cost. Sometimes, it will come from foreign sources.

I am tired of this protectionist crap.

4 posted on 05/12/2011 6:12:10 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
They should have just pulled some Skyraiders out of the museums...


5 posted on 05/12/2011 6:14:53 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
try to ignore the provision in Embraer's bylaws allowing that government to cut off the flow of spare parts and supplies if it doesn't like the way the plane is being used somewhere.

Already taken care of:

The U.S. is going to lend billions of dollars to Brazil's state-owned oil company, Petrobras, to finance exploration of the huge offshore discovery in Brazil's Tupi oil field in the Santos Basin near Rio de Janeiro. Brazil's planning minister confirmed that White House National Security Adviser James Jones met this month [August 2009] with Brazilian officials to talk about the loan. - Wall Steet Journal

6 posted on 05/12/2011 6:16:45 AM PDT by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Too bad we crushed all those P-51’s. Looks like we could have up graded them and saved a bundle. Then again, those Douglas Sky Raiders could do the job too.


7 posted on 05/12/2011 6:18:07 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The storm clouds of war are on the horizon, 1939 is again approaching us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Heh.
That'd get their attention - I've read that SPADs carried the same bomb load as a B-17 did in WWII.
But whatever it is, it'll be a turbo prop. Jet A fuel commonality.
8 posted on 05/12/2011 6:22:02 AM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
EMB 314


9 posted on 05/12/2011 6:24:05 AM PDT by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
What's wrong with this proven bird?


10 posted on 05/12/2011 6:25:06 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I’d think AirTractor could be potential contender, but I suspect that the adminsitration would make sure that no company based it Texas would ever have a shot at it.


11 posted on 05/12/2011 6:29:03 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Beat me by one minute!

The Sandy is the perfect aircraft for this mission. The A-10 is almost as good, but could be fielded in many other roles.


12 posted on 05/12/2011 6:29:06 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

i have to agree...a heavily armed UAV could loiter over the battlefield with zero risk except to your ego.

also dont they have the a-10 warthog...which personally i find the coolest aircraft in the universe...but then again thats just me...(or was that cancelled?)


13 posted on 05/12/2011 6:29:50 AM PDT by Irishguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So the OV-10X Bronco is no longer in consideration?


14 posted on 05/12/2011 6:30:23 AM PDT by Roger_Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
with UAVs, why do we need this plane...other than to put pilots at risk?

tactical fixed wing [intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance] platform to provide expeditionary, organic Find/Fix/Finish operations for SOF Forces in a maneuverable, long range, low heat signature platform

15 posted on 05/12/2011 6:30:25 AM PDT by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Hobo 51


16 posted on 05/12/2011 6:35:22 AM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lysandru

Wait a minute - the T-6 Texas II has been on the flightline at Randolph AFB for close to 10 years. Why do you say it’s still in development? There’s not a whole lot Beech needs to do in order to modify the trainer version for combat, because the original design contemplated this role 15 years ago.

BTW, the pilots who fly the T-6 love it, especially after they modified the controls so the fuel shutoff valve doesn’t accidentally get engaged...

Colonel, USAFR


17 posted on 05/12/2011 6:38:06 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
But whatever it is, it'll be a turbo prop

A 1,600 SHP Pratt & Whitney PT6A-68/3 turboprop engine that incorporates FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) and EICAS (Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System) powers the [Super Tocano].

18 posted on 05/12/2011 6:39:20 AM PDT by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The author neglected to mention he has been retained by Lockheed/Martin, which is Hawker Beech’s partner in the AT-6 program.


19 posted on 05/12/2011 6:41:02 AM PDT by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Full, real-time, 360 degree 3-D, situational awareness.

Sensor capabilities are considerable and improving. But you can never fully replace the eyes and mind of a pilot IN the context of the battlefield. Especially when you’re supporting troops on the ground in a fluid battle-scape.

MHO


20 posted on 05/12/2011 6:43:36 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson