1 posted on
05/12/2011 5:58:53 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
Thanks to Whenifhow for the link.
2 posted on
05/12/2011 5:59:40 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Users to DOJ... Get bent.
4 posted on
05/12/2011 6:01:18 AM PDT by
BCR #226
(02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: ShadowAce
We also need to keep tabs on government officials and employees by having them wired to the Internet 24/7 with webcam/microphones so we can be sure that they are not doing anything illegal and are performing their duties correctly.
6 posted on
05/12/2011 6:05:44 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
To: ShadowAce
That's why Weinstein urged the Senate Judiciarys Privacy, Technology and the Law subcommittee on Tuesday to consider data-retention legislation as it weighs new privacy efforts in the digital age. The top DOJ official said such a congressional fix would boost the agency's ability to investigate privacy breaches, prosecute other digital crimes and ferret out abuses in the offline world. So the government wants to force ISPs to keep track of user's data to protect user's privacy. What an Orwellian statement.
7 posted on
05/12/2011 6:07:27 AM PDT by
6SJ7
(atlasShruggedInd = TRUE)
To: ShadowAce
All data is collected and stored. Every last byte.
The beauty of the systemic data collection mechanism is the inability to discern the specific needle in the stack of needles.
The stack is higher than the sky, and the ability of the individual to sort through such is... limited, at best.
10 posted on
05/12/2011 6:10:04 AM PDT by
mmercier
(hide in plain sight)
To: ShadowAce
This administration must have quite an enemies list if they need to access everyones ISP.
11 posted on
05/12/2011 6:10:13 AM PDT by
Marty62
(Marty60)
To: ShadowAce
But data-retention rules are particularly appealing to DOJ, which argued at a hearing earlier this year that such legislation would assist greatly with cyberstalking . . . Well said.
16 posted on
05/12/2011 6:38:26 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: ShadowAce
Sure they want to track everyone. Makes it easier for the democrat party to identify who needs to be rounded up and sent to reeducation camps.
FUBO & FAD
17 posted on
05/12/2011 6:41:09 AM PDT by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: ShadowAce
Sooner or later they will find out that this country doesn't have a system in place to control 300 million people. Collective civility is only a function of individual choice. Once the fuse is lit, it will be a free-for-all.
20 posted on
05/12/2011 7:21:25 AM PDT by
Niteranger68
(Jared Lee Loughner - Disciple of Michael Moore)
To: ShadowAce
I’d do business with any ISP that directed all non-active IP address information to /dev/null. It would save them a lot of hassle. When the feds come knocking, you can’t give them what you don’t have.
22 posted on
05/12/2011 8:21:45 AM PDT by
zeugma
(The only thing in the social security trust fund is your children and grandchildren's sweat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson