Posted on 05/10/2011 5:49:14 PM PDT by decimon
I don’t want to seem callous but it is up to each of us to provide for ourselves and this includes preparing for a catastrophe. We went through a devastating fire but had adequate insurance so came out whole.
Think I’d get a bank to help me get $20,000 in pennies and dump them, loose of course, at their office.
Translation: Affirmative-action made us do it.
I’ll bet he’s not one of “Holder’s people”.
Yeah we need to stop thinking the government should provide for us in the event of disasters. It just leads to government theft of money and rights.
My congressman is trying to end the use of faulty FEMA flood maps in setting insurance rates. FEMA didn’t have enough money to pay for these floods so they enlarged the floodplains so they could grab more of the money that is set aside by insurance companies in turn driving up insurance rates.
My house is in a floodplain that didn’t exist a year ago.
So if you pay for insurance for years and years it is the insurance company that is responsible restore your belongings. If you don’t buy insurance then it’s the taxpayer’s responsibility. Now I get it. No wonder the government has such a hard time convincing anyone in California to buy earthquake and/or flood insurance.
I think we’d all be better off without federal “help”.
If you aren't one of Eric Holder's people, screw you.
Your federal govt works for you! I know now that no matter what happens to my property, I will not take one red cent of federal money to fix the problem.
If FEMA should even be allowed to exist......their only job should be showing up with food, water, clean clothing, etc. Govt should not be in the biz of paying anyone because of disasters or being an insurance provider.
If they don’t have insurance then they should have to depend on the goodwill of others.
Make no mistake about what is going on here.
Is this man White?
Goodie for you. The fact is insurance is a crapshoot. We've learned from the many wildfires in CA that insurance carriers may or may not actually pay out and will foot drag for years. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find it's no different with flood insurers even now.
Giving him 30 days to repay for FEMA's error is obscene.
There will be more. As I watched the waters flowing by the roof tops, the owners whined that they didn’t have any flood insurance. Now, why would anyone who lives near a river want flood insurance?
That's because you live in VA, and VA's a red state. Same thing is happening to TX. Obama won't let $ go to red states!
Heck, even NJ is getting denied FEMA aid after some devastating weather. This might seem surprising because NJ's a blue state - but then you have to remember that Chris Christie is governor there.
I guess I am in the minority for being of the belief that it is up to every individual to insure their property and possessions. Why in hell’s bathroom should the collective taxpayers be on the hook for personal property? Whether a renter or a homeowner, the applicable insurance should be purchased to protect from financial ruin in the event of vis major.
The argument that insurance companies “drag their feet” in resolving claims, whether true or not, is irrelevant to the broader issue of taxpayer provided lump sum handouts to ill prepared individuals. There are remedies available if insurers fail to act in accordance with policy terms - taxpayers should not be one of them. Short term relief while awaiting settlements is one thing, a $20k check is another.
The argument that one cannot afford adequate insurance is ignorant. No one can reasonably NOT afford to have adequate insurance on property. The poor decision to reduce coverage levels, or drop coverage altogether, should not be rewarded by a check at the end of the rainbow.
I don't think you're in the minority in this forum.
Pigford. Disgusting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.